2017
DOI: 10.3390/genes8060169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying Bird Remains Using Ancient DNA Barcoding

Abstract: Bird remains that are difficult to identify taxonomically using morphological methods, are common in the palaeontological record. Other types of challenging avian material include artefacts and food items from endangered taxa, as well as remains from aircraft strikes. We here present a DNA-based method that enables taxonomic identification of bird remains, even from material where the DNA is heavily degraded. The method is based on the amplification and sequencing of two short variable parts of the 16S region … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DNA in very old samples is often severely fragmented and highly contaminated, and thus it is very difficult to successfully amplify for species identification—even for very short amplicons (e.g. <100 bp) [14,16,21,22]. In another study, 80 woolly mammoth samples were amplified using a species-specific primer pair with an amplicon size of 114 bp, and 19 samples could not be successfully sequenced.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…DNA in very old samples is often severely fragmented and highly contaminated, and thus it is very difficult to successfully amplify for species identification—even for very short amplicons (e.g. <100 bp) [14,16,21,22]. In another study, 80 woolly mammoth samples were amplified using a species-specific primer pair with an amplicon size of 114 bp, and 19 samples could not be successfully sequenced.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presently, the most frequently used methods for species identification are genetic-based PCR amplifications followed by sequencing and BLAST search (). These techniques have been continuously developed and widely used in various fields, including forensic science, paleontology, archaeology, wildlife research, and bird strike investigations [13,14,15,16,17]. DNA barcoding has become one of the most promising methods for species identification since Hebert et al [18] established the first barcoding system using a ~600 bp DNA fragment located in the mitochondrial gene cytochrome c oxidase I ( COI ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, ancient DNA has been used for establishing the biological sex [8], for providing species identification (e.g. [9,10]) and to infer familiar genetic relationships within archaeological communities [11][12][13] as well as to reconstruct past diets and environments (e.g. [14]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given their abundance in museum collections and the diversity of writing supports made of plant material, such as papyrus scrolls, wood tablets, and paper, with one exception [ 12 ], plant derived manuscripts are an underexplored target for DNA analyses. In theory, DNA molecules can be obtained from any organic material such as bone [ 13 , 14 ], eggshell [ 15 ], wood [ 16 , 17 ], as well as from processed material, for example food [ 18 , 19 ], clothing [ 20 22 ], and parchment [ 1 4 , 23 ]. The survival and preservation of DNA molecules is not only influenced by the age of a sample, but to a higher degree by the organic source [ 24 26 ] and the environment [ 27 , 28 ], with arid conditions and low temperature fluctuations favoring long time DNA survival.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%