2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10899-021-10082-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying Associated Factors for Illegal Acts among Patients with Gambling Disorder and ADHD

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding clinical features, patients who had not committed gambling-related illegal acts showed lower GD severity than those who had (with or without legal consequences). Previous studies also reported higher levels of GD severity in those patients who had committed gambling-related crimes [ 19 , 25 , 50 , 51 ]. These findings would lend support to the fact that illegal acts are a clear indicator of GD severity, rather than a diagnostic criterion per se [ 11 , 12 ], and that it is unlikely that an individual would commit illegal acts in the absence of other diagnostic criteria for GD [ 52 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding clinical features, patients who had not committed gambling-related illegal acts showed lower GD severity than those who had (with or without legal consequences). Previous studies also reported higher levels of GD severity in those patients who had committed gambling-related crimes [ 19 , 25 , 50 , 51 ]. These findings would lend support to the fact that illegal acts are a clear indicator of GD severity, rather than a diagnostic criterion per se [ 11 , 12 ], and that it is unlikely that an individual would commit illegal acts in the absence of other diagnostic criteria for GD [ 52 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Participants were classified into three different groups according to their criminal behavior: patients with no history of gambling-related illegal acts ( n = 85; Illegal−), patients with a history of gambling-related illegal acts without legal repercussions ( n = 55; Illegal + Cons−), and patients who had committed gambling-related illegal acts that had legal consequences ( n = 31; Illegal + Cons+). This classification has already been used in previous studies [ 25 ]. Only those patients who reported illegal acts on both DSM-IV-TR criterion 8 [ 26 ] and the clinical interview were included in the illegal acts groups.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%