2020
DOI: 10.14324/herj.17.2.01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying aspects of temporal orientation in students’ moral reflections

Abstract: History education comprises moral issues and moral aspects, often perceived as an important and meaning-making foundation that makes learning relevant and interesting. The interrelationship between time layers fuels historical interpretations and facilitates perceptions of moral issues. This article focuses on a study investigating how secondary school students express inter-temporal relationships in encounters with a morally challenging historical event, which for the participants would have been a moral dile… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can in the future be used as an analytical tool to study, for instance, young people's moral reasoning in history education. We know today, for example, that it is mainly existential approaches to morality that engage students, which does not necessarily mean that they stop working with factual knowledge (Ammert et al, 2020). Chinnery (2014) highlights four strands of historical consciousness, namely the existential strand that takes interest in how people reflect on themselves when encountering history, the cognitive (knowledge-based) strand that argues that moral character building takes form through (rational) knowledge about the past, a narrative strand that involves stimulating a moral awareness through interpreting and using narratives from the past to guide the present, and a caring strand that aims at developing caring relationship (ibid).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can in the future be used as an analytical tool to study, for instance, young people's moral reasoning in history education. We know today, for example, that it is mainly existential approaches to morality that engage students, which does not necessarily mean that they stop working with factual knowledge (Ammert et al, 2020). Chinnery (2014) highlights four strands of historical consciousness, namely the existential strand that takes interest in how people reflect on themselves when encountering history, the cognitive (knowledge-based) strand that argues that moral character building takes form through (rational) knowledge about the past, a narrative strand that involves stimulating a moral awareness through interpreting and using narratives from the past to guide the present, and a caring strand that aims at developing caring relationship (ibid).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rüsen believes that there is a moral element in historical consciousness, because according to his empirical observations, people are predisposed to give history moral meanings. Ammert, Sharp, Löfström, and Edling (2020) suggest that in the context of history teaching, addressing issues connected to moral values can deepen knowledge and stimulate students' historical consciousness, which in turn can contribute to students' moral development. They showed in their empirical analysis that more than a third of their sample of 15-year-old high school students from Finland and Sweden were able to reflect the interrelations between the past, the present, and the future, when they were given a task concerning morally relevant historical events.…”
Section: Similarities Between Historical and Moral Consciousnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historians study what has already happened and so must have a mechanism to reconstruct the past in the present. The past is revived via the historian's imagination and perspective, as Parfitt (2001, p. 7) asserts, "to imagine something is to make that thing present Sharp, H. (2020). Historical empathy activities in Australian History textbooks: An assessment tool to examine disciplinary and cognitive domains.…”
Section: Endnotesmentioning
confidence: 99%