All Days 2010
DOI: 10.2118/133534-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying and Quantifying Thin-Bedded Pay (Part A): Log Characteristics and Reservoir Quality

Abstract: Thinly bedded reservoirs are common throughout the Columbus Basin, but have traditionally been overlooked as productive targets. The presence of interbedded shales suppresses resistivity values within the thin sand beds (<2 feet thick), resulting in low-resistivity log signatures that do not meet conventional pay cut-offs. Core data and advanced high-resolution log analysis are required to accurately evaluate reservoir quality. In the absence of such data, thin bedded pay can still be identified on conv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may originate from the lesser segregation between pure shale and pure sand end members as compared to deepwater counterparts plus less "perceived" connectivity of individual sand lamina as well as connectivity between thin-bed packages. However, there are numerous documented studies that show that thin sand beds in these environments have comparable reservoir quality to that of the conventional thickerbedded facies (e.g., Henderson et al 2006). Same observation was made in this study when bed thickness was plotted against rock quality index (RQI) computed from core data (i.e., core porosity and permeability) (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…This may originate from the lesser segregation between pure shale and pure sand end members as compared to deepwater counterparts plus less "perceived" connectivity of individual sand lamina as well as connectivity between thin-bed packages. However, there are numerous documented studies that show that thin sand beds in these environments have comparable reservoir quality to that of the conventional thickerbedded facies (e.g., Henderson et al 2006). Same observation was made in this study when bed thickness was plotted against rock quality index (RQI) computed from core data (i.e., core porosity and permeability) (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The proportion of sandstone can readily be measured in core, and potentially indirectly deduced in wireline log data using careful petrophysical analysis (e.g. Henderson et al, 2010). However, the thickness of scour-fill sandstones is unlikely to be a parameter that can be robustly measured in core and wireline-log data (e.g.…”
Section: Application To Reservoir Characterisation Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10), although, with due care, cored intervals may be used to calibrate wireline-log responses in uncored wells (e.g. Worthington, 2000;Henderson et al, 2010). 3Compare the thickness of sandstone scourfills in the outcrop analogue with mudstone-interbed thickness in cored reservoir successions, in order to interpret thick, laterally extensive mudstone barriers.…”
Section: Workflow For Improved Characterisation Of Heterolithic Distamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such intervals are common in many wave-dominated deltaic reservoirs, but it is difficult to characterise their effective properties and potential productivity (e.g. Worthington, 2000;Henderson et al, 2010;Baillie & James-Romano, 2010). Core plugs sample an unrepresentatively small volume, typically from either a sandstone bed or a mudstone interbed, with the former giving measured values of vertical-to-horizontal permeability ratio (kv/kh) of 0.01 to 0.4 (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%