2021 IEEE International Conference on Social Sciences and Intelligent Management (SSIM) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/ssim49526.2021.9555200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying and predicting default borrowers in P2P lending platform: A machine learning approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An artificial neural network (ANN) [4], [16] that has a feed-forward architecture and is made up of numerous layers of neurons is called a multilayer perceptron (MLP). A MLP has three or more layers including one input, one output, and one or even more hidden layers.…”
Section: Multilayer Perceptronmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An artificial neural network (ANN) [4], [16] that has a feed-forward architecture and is made up of numerous layers of neurons is called a multilayer perceptron (MLP). A MLP has three or more layers including one input, one output, and one or even more hidden layers.…”
Section: Multilayer Perceptronmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Los modelos de Machine Learning han sido ampliamente utilizados para la evaluación de riesgo crediticio [2], [3] y específicamente para la plataforma Lending Club [5] En [2] se realiza una comparación de los modelos de Machine Learning utilizados para calificación crediticia Sobre el dataset público compartido por la plataforma Lending Club. Fueron considerados datos de julio a diciembre del 2019, teniendo la información de 75,327 solicitantes de créditos con 142 atributos.…”
Section: B Modelos De Riesgo Crediticiounclassified
“…Esta aproximación fue la utilizada en [2]Se asume que los datos de los créditos no tienen una dependencia temporal entre ellos y se dividen los datos aleatoriamente en entrenamiento y prueba. En este trabajo se realizó una partición aleatoria de 70% para datos de entrenamiento y 30% para datos de prueba.…”
Section: Atemporalunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation