2021
DOI: 10.1108/sc-11-2020-0041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying and intervening to stop school bullying: the role of school resource officers

Abstract: Purpose The purpose of this study is to explore school resource officers (SROs) and their role in preventing, detecting and intervening in bullying incidents. Design/methodology/approach Using data from 214 survey respondents, the present study attempted to identify the personal and situational characteristics that help to understand when SROs are likely to identify and intervene in bullying incidents. Findings Taking a multivariate logistic regression approach, the results show that SROs – regardless of r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 41 publications
(112 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and youth ‘acting out’” (Ghavami et al, 2021, p. 13). Finally, others recommended training specific to the roles and responsibilities of different actors within the school (Lopez, 2019), addressing bullying (Paez & Colvin, 2021), and training on youth development more generally (Fisher & Devlin, 2020; May & Higgins, 2011; Snow et al, 2021; Stinson & Watkins, 2014; Theriot, 2016). Importantly, there was not a consensus on the recommendations regarding the focus, amount, or who should monitor this training.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and youth ‘acting out’” (Ghavami et al, 2021, p. 13). Finally, others recommended training specific to the roles and responsibilities of different actors within the school (Lopez, 2019), addressing bullying (Paez & Colvin, 2021), and training on youth development more generally (Fisher & Devlin, 2020; May & Higgins, 2011; Snow et al, 2021; Stinson & Watkins, 2014; Theriot, 2016). Importantly, there was not a consensus on the recommendations regarding the focus, amount, or who should monitor this training.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%