Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games 2017
DOI: 10.1145/3102071.3102081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying and evaluating successful non-meta strategies in league of legends

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, MOBA games boast metagaming strategies, which are collectively decided by players (the crowd) as the most optimal strategy for the team or for each champion. For example, [16] finds that the mostly widely successful team composition in LoL consists of one player in each of the five positions, although some non-meta teams have significant advantages.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, MOBA games boast metagaming strategies, which are collectively decided by players (the crowd) as the most optimal strategy for the team or for each champion. For example, [16] finds that the mostly widely successful team composition in LoL consists of one player in each of the five positions, although some non-meta teams have significant advantages.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other papers use the public Riot API data for team style analysis or other aspects not directly related to our purpose here. For example, Lee and Ramler (2017) analyze whether typical team composition choices of players are in fact optimal, and do Nascimento et al (2017) use machine learning and cluster analysis to identify seven profiles of varying team success.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lee and Ramler used a support vector machine to identify player roles in League of Legends (LoL) [48] based on item and spell choices. They used these to identify unconventional team composition strategies and evaluate their success rates compared to conventional teams [30]. While clustering is an effective way of quickly identifying and differentiating player types based on in-game behaviors [43], the data used tends to focus entirely on aggregated numbers [14,43,46].…”
Section: Playermentioning
confidence: 99%