1998
DOI: 10.1300/j147v22n04_04
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying and Comparing Competencies for Social Work Management II

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, Wimpfheimer (2004) mentions practices such as advocacy, governance and planning as important for social work leaders. Other researchers cite adaptive leadership traits as creating a vision (Holosko 2009) and having a boundary-spanning work function (Menefee 1998). Rank and Hutchison (2000) interviewed social work managers who noted the importance of maintaining the profession's reputation, a dedication to ethical standards and altruism.…”
Section: Adaptive Managersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, Wimpfheimer (2004) mentions practices such as advocacy, governance and planning as important for social work leaders. Other researchers cite adaptive leadership traits as creating a vision (Holosko 2009) and having a boundary-spanning work function (Menefee 1998). Rank and Hutchison (2000) interviewed social work managers who noted the importance of maintaining the profession's reputation, a dedication to ethical standards and altruism.…”
Section: Adaptive Managersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical research that can be identified with enabling leadership practices in social work concentrates on the importance of interpersonal relations and collaboration (Beddoe, Davys, and Adamson 2014;Menefee 1998;Menefee and Thompson 1994) as well as distributed leadership (De Gibaja 2001) and enabling dialogue among social workers (Leung 2009). These interpersonal practices include supervision (Beddoe, Davys, andAdamson 2014), relationship-building (De Gibaja 2001) and motivation and support (Gellis 2001;York 1996).…”
Section: [Table 3 Near Here]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These administrative consequences of privatization and performance contracting can be understood through existing conceptual lenses that organize the major functions of social service administration. In particular, privatization and performance contracting appear to require administrators to devote increased attention to boundary spanning activities involving coordination of strategic efforts within and across key departments and agencies (Frahm & Martin, 2009;Menefee, 1998;Menefee & Thompson, 1994). Coordination and collaboration have a long scholarly history within administrative practice in public organizations (Agranoff & McGuire, 2001;Milward & Provan, 2000), nonprofit agencies (Smith & Lipsky, 1993), and the social service sector overall (Austin, 2002;Smith, 2010).…”
Section: Administrative Roles and Managerial Agency In Changing Contrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This transformation has forced managers to shift their attention away from interpersonal and technical skills focused primarily on internal operations and more towards skills aimed at aligning the organization with its external environment (i.e., strategic). In an effort to substantiate these findings, Menefee (1998) replicated his original study and found a "remarkable" level of consistency (p. 58). Some social welfare management researchers have disputed the assertions of Menefee and Thompson (1994).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 69%