2019
DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000000398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying and Codifying Complications after Radical Cystectomy: Comparison of Administrative Diagnostic and Procedure Codes, and Clinical Chart Review

Abstract: Purpose: To our knowledge the reliability of administrative claims codes to report postoperative radical cystectomy complications has not been examined. We compared complications identified by claims data to those abstracted from clinical chart review following radical cystectomy. Methods:We manually reviewed the charts of 268 patients treated with radical cystectomy between 2014 and 2016 for 30-day complications and queried administrative complication coding using 805 ICD-9/10 codes. Complications were catego… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Lastly, it is inherently difficult to generalize the outcomes to pre-existing literature, as there is much pre--existing literature demonstrating a large discordance in the consistency of data collection and urologic oncology outcome reporting (7,29,30). A strength of the NSQIP database however is that it collects data using standardized, clinical chart abstraction, which has been shown to be more comprehensive and reliable than administrative databases to identify complications (31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, it is inherently difficult to generalize the outcomes to pre-existing literature, as there is much pre--existing literature demonstrating a large discordance in the consistency of data collection and urologic oncology outcome reporting (7,29,30). A strength of the NSQIP database however is that it collects data using standardized, clinical chart abstraction, which has been shown to be more comprehensive and reliable than administrative databases to identify complications (31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peyton et al (page 913) from Tampa, Florida compared the accuracy of claims based data to chart review for complications of radical cystectomy. 8 Chart review identified 1 or more complication in 45% of cases compared to only 29% from claims coding data. The difference was even greater for cases with increased length of stay wherein a higher rate of complications is expected.…”
Section: Identifying and Codifying Radical Cystectomy Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The indicator of in-hospital mortality included disease-related death and death from other causes. According to previous studies, [15][16][17][18][19] complications were defined using ICD-10 codes as registration of the following diseases: (i) sepsis (A32.7, A40.x, A41.x, A42.7, B37.7, and T81.4); (ii) disseminated intravascular coagulation (D65); (iii) pulmonary embolism (I26.x); (iv) cardiac events (ischemic heart disease [I20.x-I24.x] and heart failure [I11.0 and I50.x]); (v) other vascular complications (I71.x, I73.9, I74.x, I77.x, I80-I83.x, I89.x, K55.0, K55.9, T79.0, T79.1, and T81.7); (vi) stroke (I60.x-I64); (vii) pneumonia or influenza (J10.x-J18.x); (viii) other respiratory complications (J46, J69.0, J70.x, J80-J86.x, J93.x, J94.2, J95.x, and J96.x); (ix) peritonitis or peritoneal abscess (K65.x, N73.3, and N73.5); (x) ileus (K56.x and K91.3); (xi) acute renal failure (N17x, N28.0, and N99.0); (xii) genitourinary infection (N10, N30.x, N41.x, N45.x, N70.x-N73.x, and N76); (xiii) other genitourinary complications (N13.x, N32.x, N35.x, N36.x, N82.x, and N99.x); (xiv) disruption of an operation wound (T81.3); and (xv) intraoperative complications (S34.x-S39.x and T81.2).…”
Section: Outcomes Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%