2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.102.084062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying and addressing nonstationary LISA noise

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our particular case, they function as a signature of non-Kerrness, though we expect that similar effects should occur in N > 2-body EMRIs [46,47] or when the multipole structure of the small-mass companion is taken into account [48][49][50]. Interestingly, instrumental glitches have been spotted in LISA pathfinder data [79], though such events in the acceleration noise are rather abrupt and have a distinct structure with respect to the glitches shown here. Therefore, our results serve as a phonomenological imprint of non-integrability and portray a "smoking-gun" of chaotic phenomena in EMRIs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…In our particular case, they function as a signature of non-Kerrness, though we expect that similar effects should occur in N > 2-body EMRIs [46,47] or when the multipole structure of the small-mass companion is taken into account [48][49][50]. Interestingly, instrumental glitches have been spotted in LISA pathfinder data [79], though such events in the acceleration noise are rather abrupt and have a distinct structure with respect to the glitches shown here. Therefore, our results serve as a phonomenological imprint of non-integrability and portray a "smoking-gun" of chaotic phenomena in EMRIs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…This arises from the length increase of the signal, which now coalesces in the center of the Tukey window, but the inspiral starts before the window, transitioning between two radically different forms of the noise. We expect to see even greater discrepancies with the stationary model when we consistently observe longer signals, a problem that has already been identified for LISA [58], for which antenna repointing will create data gaps during the observation of signals. The assumption of stationarity in these periods will lead to parameter estimation biases.…”
Section: The Effect Of Nonstationarity On the Covariance Matrix Of A ...mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…For example, Refs. [56][57][58] discussed the concept of nonstationarities in detector data evolving the power spectral density (PSD) over time, referred to as PSD drift. This causes a loss in sensitivity of the detectors, so correction methodology is offered by computing a running estimate of all matched filter overlaps.…”
Section: Characterizing the Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In GW data analysis, a typical approach is to estimate the PSD offline on a large batch of data and off-source: this scheme assumes stationary data on a long timescale (longer than the data under study) and it might not reflect the structure of the noise in the analyzed time slice. Some alternatives exist for dropping this assumption and modifying the likelihood accordingly (Röver et al 2010;Röver 2011;Edwards et al 2020;Chatziioannou et al 2021). MESA can add to those an elegant way out: at each evaluation of the likelihood, a new spectral analysis is performed by computing the PSD on the residual d t − x t .…”
Section: Final Remarks and Future Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%