Identify glioma recurrence and treatment effects with triple-tracer PET/CT

Abstract

Background Differential diagnosis of tumour recurrence (TuR) from treatment effects (TrE), mostly induced by radiotherapy and chemotherapy, is still difficult by using conventional computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. We have investigated the diagnostic performance of PET/CT with 3 tracers, 13N-NH3, 18F-FDOPA, and 18F-FDG, to identify TuR and TrE in glioma patients following treatment. Methods Forty-three patients with MR-suspected recurrent glioma were included. The maximum and mean standardized uptake values (SUVmax and SUVmean) of the lesion and the lesion-to-normal grey-matter cortex uptake (L/G) ratio were obtained from each tracer PET/CT. TuR or TrE was determined by histopathology or clinical MR follow-up for at least 6 months. Results In this cohort, 34 patients were confirmed to have TuR, and 9 patients met the diagnostic standard of TrE. The SUVmax and SUVmean of 13N-NH3 and 18F-FDOPA PET/CT at TuR lesions were significantly higher compared with normal brain tissue (13N-NH3 0.696 ± 0.558, 0.625 ± 0.507 vs 0.486 ± 0.413; 18F-FDOPA 0.455 ± 0.518, 0.415 ± 0.477 vs 0.194 ± 0.203; both P < 0.01), but there was no significant difference in 18F-FDG (6.918 ± 3.190, 6.016 ± 2.807 vs 6.356 ± 3.104, P = 0.290 and 0.493). L/G ratios of 13N-NH3 and 18F-FDOPA were significantly higher in TuR than in TrE group (13N-NH3, 1.573 ± 0.099 vs 1.025 ± 0.128, P = 0.008; 18F-FDOPA, 2.729 ± 0.131 vs 1.514 ± 0.141, P < 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity and AUC (area under the curve) by ROC (receiver operating characteristic) analysis were 57.7%, 100% and 0.803, for 13N-NH3; 84.6%, 100% and 0.938, for 18F-FDOPA; and 80.8%, 100%, and 0.952, for the combination, respectively. Conclusion Our results suggest that although multiple tracer PET/CT may improve differential diagnosis efficacy, for glioma TuR from TrE, 18F-FDOPA PET-CT is the most reliable. The combination of 18F-FDOPA and 13N-NH3 does not increase the diagnostic efficiency, while 18F-FDG is not worthy for differential diagnosis of glioma TuR and TrE.

Advanced Imaging Techniques for Newly Diagnosed and Recurrent Gliomas

“…Furthermore, inflammatory processes following chemoradiation can lead to a transient edematous process that can mimic signs of tumor recurrence in both HGG and LGG patients for several months after therapy. This process is often mistaken for tumor progression but does not represent true tumor recurrence and is thus termed pseudoprogression ( Figure 13 ; Winter et al, 2020 ; Li et al, 2021 ).…”

“…There are also reported differences in Cho/NAA ratios between recurrent tumor and areas of radiation-induced necrosis ( Chuang et al, 2016 ). Despite these imaging modalities being more effective than anatomic MRI in helping distinguish between pseudoprogression, treatment effect, and true progression, their accuracy and efficacy is limited and often surgical biopsy with histopathological analysis is needed to confirm the diagnosis ( Li et al, 2021 ).…”