2010
DOI: 10.1299/jmmp.4.781
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of Young's Modulus from Indentation Testing and Inverse Analysis

Abstract: In this study, a numerical method for the identification of the Young's modulus of linear elastic coated materials from continuous indentation test is first presented. The identification is based on an inverse analysis where the minimization of a cost functional is performed by a gradient descent algorithm. The main result is the computation of cost function gradient by using a direct differentiation technique, resulting in a timesaving method compared to the widely used finite difference method. The validity … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…where R is the radius of the spherical indenter (R=0.5 mm in our case), h is the penetration depth, h max is the maximal penetration depth, and F 1 and F 2 are the load for the two considered curves, respectively. This error is widely used in inverse analysis [21,24,25]. Because of the experimental conditions and the sample's dimensions, h max /R=0.23 was chosen.…”
Section: -Quantification Of the Difference Between Two Indentation Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where R is the radius of the spherical indenter (R=0.5 mm in our case), h is the penetration depth, h max is the maximal penetration depth, and F 1 and F 2 are the load for the two considered curves, respectively. This error is widely used in inverse analysis [21,24,25]. Because of the experimental conditions and the sample's dimensions, h max /R=0.23 was chosen.…”
Section: -Quantification Of the Difference Between Two Indentation Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After eight measurements at various sites, the average hardness and Young's modulus were obtained to be 12.86 and 159.47 GPa, respectively (Table S1, Supporting Information). For film‐like materials, a generally accepted rule is to limit the indentation depth to 10%–20% of the film thickness to prevent errors related to the substrates . To confirm the above results, two‐layered SGA with a thickness of ≈400 nm (see Figure f) was tested eight times at the indentation depths of 30 and 60 nm, respectively (Figure b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Figure shows the mechanical properties of SGA measured by a Hysitron nanoindenter equipped with a Berkovich tip . A typical load‐displacement curve of a one‐layer SGA was obtained at a constant loading/unloading rate of 50 µN s −1 (Figure a), and the corresponding optical monitoring window is presented in the inset of Figure a.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A complementary approach to the direct identification formulae is to try to extract the information about the mechanical properties directly from the load-displacement 6 indentation curves, by making use of inverse analysis like [24]. Inverse analyses are generally based on the minimization of a cost function measuring the discrepancy between the experimental load-displacement curve and a simulated one.…”
Section: Identification Of Mechanical Properties Via Indentation Testmentioning
confidence: 99%