Identification of Y chromatin directly in gonadal tissue by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH): Significance for Ullrich-Turner syndrome screening in the cytogenetics laboratory
Abstract:The presence of Y chromatin in individuals with Ullrich-Turner syndrome (UTS) confers a risk for gonadoblastoma. In mosaic cases, little is known about Y chromatin distribution in gonads. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is a direct approach to assess the extent of Y chromatin mosaicism in gonads. Gonadal tissue from four patients with mosaic karyotypes were analyzed by routine cytogenetics and FISH with X and Y centromere probes. Y chromatin was present in gonads in varying percentages in these patie… Show more
“…As in previous studies 7,8,10 we observed no correlation between the degree of mosaicism in PBL and in gonadal cells, nor was the PBL karyotype able to predict the differentiation patterns that had developed in the dysgenetic gonad. Differential growth of the 45,X and 46,XY cell lines in vitro and the selection of a subset of clones for PBL karyotyping cannot be excluded.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…In spite of our increasing knowledge on genes involved in normal sex development, the disturbed gonadal differentiation processes that underlie gonadal dysgenesis (GD) syndromes are less well understood 1–5 . Little is known about the correlations between peripheral blood (PBL) karyotype and/or skin fibroblasts on the one hand, and the gonadal karyotype and morphological differentiation patterns of the gonad on the other 6–11 . Traditionally, in GD, three differentiation patterns have been described: (dysgenetic) testicular tissue, ovarian tissue, and streak gonads.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was shown that in the presence of TSPY, areas of gonadal tissue with a low degree of differentiation (UGT) are at highest risk for GB development 12 . The direct exclusion or confirmation of Y chromosomal material in the dysgenetic gonad is more relevant in this context than PBL karyotyping but is technically more difficult 7,10 . Because of the risk for germ cell tumours a prophylactic gonadectomy has been advised in all GD patients 21–24 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5] Little is known about the correlations between peripheral blood (PBL) karyotype and/or skin fibroblasts on the one hand, and the gonadal karyotype and morphological differentiation patterns of the gonad on the other. [6][7][8][9][10][11] Traditionally, in GD, three differentiation patterns have been described: (dysgenetic) testicular tissue, ovarian tissue, and streak gonads. Recently, a fourth pattern was recognized, the so-called undifferentiated gonadal tissue (UGT), which consists of germ cells lining up together with Sertoli/granulosa cells to form cord-like structures, or residing without specific organization in a background of stromal cells.…”
The distribution of the Y-containing cell line in peripheral blood is not a suitable indicator for predicting the histological differentiation pattern found in the gonads of patients with gonadal dysgenesis. The analysis of Y-containing cell lines in the gonads of such patients could be informative with regard to the specific characteristics of gonadal development in humans as compared to chimeric mouse models. Moreover, it is essential to understand the mechanisms underlying disturbed gonadogenesis in these patients. As the gonadal karyotype is not related to the encountered gonadal differentiation pattern, it does not allow prediction of the risk for gonadoblastoma formation.
“…As in previous studies 7,8,10 we observed no correlation between the degree of mosaicism in PBL and in gonadal cells, nor was the PBL karyotype able to predict the differentiation patterns that had developed in the dysgenetic gonad. Differential growth of the 45,X and 46,XY cell lines in vitro and the selection of a subset of clones for PBL karyotyping cannot be excluded.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…In spite of our increasing knowledge on genes involved in normal sex development, the disturbed gonadal differentiation processes that underlie gonadal dysgenesis (GD) syndromes are less well understood 1–5 . Little is known about the correlations between peripheral blood (PBL) karyotype and/or skin fibroblasts on the one hand, and the gonadal karyotype and morphological differentiation patterns of the gonad on the other 6–11 . Traditionally, in GD, three differentiation patterns have been described: (dysgenetic) testicular tissue, ovarian tissue, and streak gonads.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was shown that in the presence of TSPY, areas of gonadal tissue with a low degree of differentiation (UGT) are at highest risk for GB development 12 . The direct exclusion or confirmation of Y chromosomal material in the dysgenetic gonad is more relevant in this context than PBL karyotyping but is technically more difficult 7,10 . Because of the risk for germ cell tumours a prophylactic gonadectomy has been advised in all GD patients 21–24 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5] Little is known about the correlations between peripheral blood (PBL) karyotype and/or skin fibroblasts on the one hand, and the gonadal karyotype and morphological differentiation patterns of the gonad on the other. [6][7][8][9][10][11] Traditionally, in GD, three differentiation patterns have been described: (dysgenetic) testicular tissue, ovarian tissue, and streak gonads. Recently, a fourth pattern was recognized, the so-called undifferentiated gonadal tissue (UGT), which consists of germ cells lining up together with Sertoli/granulosa cells to form cord-like structures, or residing without specific organization in a background of stromal cells.…”
The distribution of the Y-containing cell line in peripheral blood is not a suitable indicator for predicting the histological differentiation pattern found in the gonads of patients with gonadal dysgenesis. The analysis of Y-containing cell lines in the gonads of such patients could be informative with regard to the specific characteristics of gonadal development in humans as compared to chimeric mouse models. Moreover, it is essential to understand the mechanisms underlying disturbed gonadogenesis in these patients. As the gonadal karyotype is not related to the encountered gonadal differentiation pattern, it does not allow prediction of the risk for gonadoblastoma formation.
“…Moreover, monozygotic twins with different
phenotypes (presumably due to different ratios of mosaicism of gonadal tissue) have been
reported (20,21,22). Different levels of mosaicism of
karyotype between lymphocytes and gonadal tissues have already been reported (23,24,25). The results of all four cases in this study
confirmed that karyotype analysis of the gonad is more consistent with the phenotype of the
gonad and external genitalia.…”
Mixed gonadal dysgenesis (MGD) is an abnormal sexual differentiation syndrome usually
presenting with ambiguous genitalia. Karyotype analysis is one of the essential components
in the diagnosis of MGD and is conventionally done with peripheral lymphocytes by the
G-banding technique. It is speculated that this conventional karyotype analysis has
limitations since there are often difference in gonadal tissue analysis. Here we present
four cases of MGD, in which karyotype analysis were performed by peripheral lymphocytes
fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), gonad fibroblasts FISH and gonad fibroblasts
G-banding technique, in addition to the conventional peripheral lymphocytes G-banding
technique. In Case 1, the percentage of the 45,X cell line in lymphocytes decreased after
birth and detection of mosaicism could only be done by karyotype of gonads at 7 mo of age.
In Case 2, FISH analysis with peripheral lymphocytes was more useful for detecting low
frequency mosaicism. In all cases, phenotype of gonads and external genitalia were more
consistent with karyotype of gonads than that of the peripheral lymphocytes G-banding
technique. In conclusion, conventional G-banding karyotype analysis with peripheral
lymphocytes has limitations in the diagnosis and evaluation of MGD. Karyotype analysis by
FISH or by using gonads is useful for diagnosing MGD and understanding of the phenotype of
gonadal tissue.
The SRY gene on the short arm of the Y chromosome is necessary for male development. Without SRY, patients with 46,XY karyotype develop as females, fail to achieve normal puberty and have dysgenic gonads and a high incidence of gonadoblastoma. Here we report a female fetus, aborted at 17 weeks of pregnancy, with a non-mosaic 46,X,del(Y)(p11.2).ish del(Y)(SRY-) karyotype diagnosed by classical cytogenetics and¯uorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Ovarian tissue was full of oocytes and mitotic ®gures. FISH studies of ovarian tissues with X and Y centromere probes revealed extensive sex chromosome mosaicism, manifested by loss of the Y chromosome and polysomy of the X chromosome. We propose that X chromosome polysomy is a post-zygotic event that arises to facilitate gonadal differentiation in the absence of all factors necessary for normal gonadal development. ß
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.