Identification of viable myocardium with contrast echocardiography in patients with poor left ventricular systolic function caused by recent or remote myocardial infarction
“…As did other investigators, we observed that no reflow was statistically more common in larger infarcts (lower mean ejection fraction and higher mean wall motion score index) and that, conversely, the presence of reflow was statistically associated with both contractile reserve by dobutamine echocardiography and recovery of regional function at follow up 35
7
18
26
27
…”
Objective-To evaluate the combined assessment of reflow and collateral blood flow by myocardial contrast echocardiography after myocardial infarction. Design-Myocardial contrast echocardiography was performed in patients with acute myocardial infarction shortly after successful coronary reperfusion (TIMI 3 patency) by direct angioplasty. Collateral flow was assessed before coronary angioplasty, and contrast reflow was evaluated 15 minutes after reperfusion. The presence of contractile reserve was assessed by low dose dobutamine echocardiography (5 to 15 µg/kg/min) at (mean (SD)) 3 (2) days after myocardial infarction. Recovery of segmental function (myocardial viability) was evaluated by resting echocardiography at a two month follow up. The study was prospective. Patients-35 consecutive patients referred for acute transmural myocardial infarction. Results-Contrast reflow was observed in 20 patients (57%) and collateral flow in 14 (40%). Contrast reflow and collateral contrast flow were both correlated with reversible dysfunction on initial dobutamine echocardiography and at follow up (p < 0.05). The presence of reflow or collateral flow on myocardial contrast echocardiography was a highly sensitive (100%) but weakly specific (60%) indicator of segmental dysfunction recovery. Simultaneous presence of contrast reflow and collateral flow was more specific of reversible dysfunction than reflow alone (90% v 60%). Conclusions-Combined assessment of reflow and collateral blood flow enhanced the sensitivity of myocardial contrast echocardiography in predicting myocardial viability after acute, reperfused myocardial infarction. The simultaneous presence of reflow and collateral blood flow was highly specific of recovery of segmental dysfunction. (Heart 1999;82:62-67)
“…As did other investigators, we observed that no reflow was statistically more common in larger infarcts (lower mean ejection fraction and higher mean wall motion score index) and that, conversely, the presence of reflow was statistically associated with both contractile reserve by dobutamine echocardiography and recovery of regional function at follow up 35
7
18
26
27
…”
Objective-To evaluate the combined assessment of reflow and collateral blood flow by myocardial contrast echocardiography after myocardial infarction. Design-Myocardial contrast echocardiography was performed in patients with acute myocardial infarction shortly after successful coronary reperfusion (TIMI 3 patency) by direct angioplasty. Collateral flow was assessed before coronary angioplasty, and contrast reflow was evaluated 15 minutes after reperfusion. The presence of contractile reserve was assessed by low dose dobutamine echocardiography (5 to 15 µg/kg/min) at (mean (SD)) 3 (2) days after myocardial infarction. Recovery of segmental function (myocardial viability) was evaluated by resting echocardiography at a two month follow up. The study was prospective. Patients-35 consecutive patients referred for acute transmural myocardial infarction. Results-Contrast reflow was observed in 20 patients (57%) and collateral flow in 14 (40%). Contrast reflow and collateral contrast flow were both correlated with reversible dysfunction on initial dobutamine echocardiography and at follow up (p < 0.05). The presence of reflow or collateral flow on myocardial contrast echocardiography was a highly sensitive (100%) but weakly specific (60%) indicator of segmental dysfunction recovery. Simultaneous presence of contrast reflow and collateral flow was more specific of reversible dysfunction than reflow alone (90% v 60%). Conclusions-Combined assessment of reflow and collateral blood flow enhanced the sensitivity of myocardial contrast echocardiography in predicting myocardial viability after acute, reperfused myocardial infarction. The simultaneous presence of reflow and collateral blood flow was highly specific of recovery of segmental dysfunction. (Heart 1999;82:62-67)
“…Contrast echocardiography assesses perfusion through the intravenous infusion of gas-filled microbubbles, which remain intravascular and allow the quantification of myocardial blood flow velocity 31. A greater contrast enhancement has been shown to predict recovery of myocardial function 32. The main limitation of this technique despite its widespread availability and low cost is the fact that it is highly operator dependant 11.…”
Section: Assessing Viability and The Role Of Imagingmentioning
“…23 In this context, a method capable of defining the amount of underperfused myocardium in absolute, and percentage values would be extremely helpful in assessing changes in myocardial perfusion before and after the patency of the infarct-related artery is achieved. Because MCE is capable of establishing myocyte integrity by defining capillary perfusion, 24 its combination with RT3D has the potential to assess microcirculatory changes derived from interventions at the level of the epicardial coronary arteries.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.