2018
DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocy094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of validated case definitions for medical conditions used in primary care electronic medical record databases: a systematic review

Abstract: PROSPERO CRD42016040020 (submitted June 8, 2016, and last revised June 14, 2016).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…38 The use of electronic health records for epidemiological research largely relies upon the accuracy of documenting by the healthcare professionals contributing to the dataset. A limitation of using such records is that no study has validated the Read codes relating to childhood maltreatment and mental ill health in UK primary care, 41 however, work has been done to try and improve maltreatment-related coding in primary care. 26 We selected the Read codes relating to outcomes with the assistance of individuals trained in psychiatry, and to mitigate any misclassification risk, we also conducted the analysis pertaining to prescription data which is coded accurately.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38 The use of electronic health records for epidemiological research largely relies upon the accuracy of documenting by the healthcare professionals contributing to the dataset. A limitation of using such records is that no study has validated the Read codes relating to childhood maltreatment and mental ill health in UK primary care, 41 however, work has been done to try and improve maltreatment-related coding in primary care. 26 We selected the Read codes relating to outcomes with the assistance of individuals trained in psychiatry, and to mitigate any misclassification risk, we also conducted the analysis pertaining to prescription data which is coded accurately.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few reviews [ 9 - 12 ] have been published on developing EMR case definitions or phenotyping algorithms for selected chronic conditions, but none specifically cover all of the Charlson comorbidities. Furthermore, these articles narrowed their scope to specific perspectives [ 10 ] or specific settings (eg, inpatient or primary care only) [ 9 , 11 ]. These reviews report few studies utilizing natural language processing (NLP) or machine learning (ML), which emphasizes the importance of data science techniques (eg, deep learning) in the present health research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of UK primary care records for epidemiological research relies upon the accuracy of documenting by the healthcare professionals contributing to the dataset. A limitation of the study is the exposure and outcome Read codes have not yet been validated against clinical notes (McBrien et al., 2018). Previous work conducted using the THIN database exploring the incidence and prevalence of domestic abuse in a primary care cohort suggests that substantial under‐recording when compared to self‐reported national survey estimates (Chandan, 2020; Chandan, Gokhale, et al., 2020; Chandan, Taylor, et al., 2020; Jeyaraman & Chandan, 2020; Office For National Statistics, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%