2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2018.09.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of top-k influential nodes based on enhanced discrete particle swarm optimization for influence maximization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To validate our proposed DMFO-based approach, we conducted experiments on five real-world network datasets and compared our results against several state-of-the-art methods, namely DC [38], BC [39], PageRank [42], simulatedannealing expected diffusion value (SAEDV) [43], Grey Wolf Optimization(GWO) [51], Degree-Descending Search Evolution(DDSE) [26], Enhanced Discrete Particle Swarm Optimization(ELDPSO) [29] and the greedy-based CELF++ [16]. The selected networks and their basic characteristics are listed in Table II, where C is the average clustering coefficient and p is the IC-model activation probability, set according to network size and average node degree.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To validate our proposed DMFO-based approach, we conducted experiments on five real-world network datasets and compared our results against several state-of-the-art methods, namely DC [38], BC [39], PageRank [42], simulatedannealing expected diffusion value (SAEDV) [43], Grey Wolf Optimization(GWO) [51], Degree-Descending Search Evolution(DDSE) [26], Enhanced Discrete Particle Swarm Optimization(ELDPSO) [29] and the greedy-based CELF++ [16]. The selected networks and their basic characteristics are listed in Table II, where C is the average clustering coefficient and p is the IC-model activation probability, set according to network size and average node degree.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gong et al [28] had used local influence estimation (LIE) to approximate the influence of node sets in a two-hop neighborhood (the neighbors' neighbors), and applied discrete particle swarm optimization (DPSO) with degree centrality; simulation results indicate good performance, but the DPSO is susceptible to local minima entrapment. This is later addressed with an enhanced discrete particle swarm optimization (ELDPSO) algorithm, that exploits network topology around the seed nodes [29]. A discrete bat algorithm (DBA) based on DPSO's discrete coding criterion had also been explored [30] for promising results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The identification of influential nodes is to pick a minimum of nodes as the initial seeds, which can achieve the maximum influenced scope, described as where A is the initially infected nodes, denotes the final influenced node set. This problem is simplified as top- k influencers identification by additional setting , which has recently attracted great research interests [ 40 , 41 , 42 ]. A variety of real-world social networks are, in fact, interconnected by different types of interactions between nodes, forming what is known as multilayer networks.…”
Section: Modeling and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed algorithm was evaluated using a co-authorship data set and the obtained experimental results showed that the proposed algorithm outperforms two well-known benchmark heuristics. Other metaheuristic algorithm such as genetic algorithm [35], simulated annealing algorithm [36,37], particle swarm optimization algorithm [38,39] and cuckoo search algorithm [40] have been utilized for dealing with the influence maximization problem too. So, the researches in this Agha Mohammad Ali Kermani et al Comput Soc Netw (2021) 8:17 field have tried to develop approximation, heuristic or metaheuristic algorithms for finding the most influential nodes in social networks.…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%