2014 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Brain Computer Interfaces (CIBCI) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/cibci.2014.7007792
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of three mental states using a motor imagery based brain machine interface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the 14 electrodes that the Emotiv-Epoc device provides, we decided to perform an analysis on the electrodes located in three different regions of the cerebral cortex looking for those with better performance to form the quaternion: (1) electrodes located on the motor cortex, which generates neural impulses that control movements, (2) those on the posterior parietal cortex, where visual information is transformed into motor instructions [ 51 ], and (3) the ones on the prefrontal cortex, which appear as a marker of the anticipations that the body must make to adapt to what is going to happen immediately after [ 52 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the 14 electrodes that the Emotiv-Epoc device provides, we decided to perform an analysis on the electrodes located in three different regions of the cerebral cortex looking for those with better performance to form the quaternion: (1) electrodes located on the motor cortex, which generates neural impulses that control movements, (2) those on the posterior parietal cortex, where visual information is transformed into motor instructions [ 51 ], and (3) the ones on the prefrontal cortex, which appear as a marker of the anticipations that the body must make to adapt to what is going to happen immediately after [ 52 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Bhattacharyya [ 22 ] conducted a study of comparative performance analysis of different classifiers, linear discriminant analysis (LDA), quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA), k-nearest neighbor (KNN), linear SVM, radial basis function (RBF) SVM and naïve Bayesian) to differentiate EEG signals for left-right limb movement, with SVM being the most accurate at 82.14%. In turn, Jiralerspong [ 23 ] conducted an experimental test of three mental states using FFT with a hamming window function that resulted in a 72% recognition rate. These strategies show good accuracy rates, but the information is extracted within a frequency or time-frequency domain, thereby losing vital information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%