2017
DOI: 10.1093/jat/bkx061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of the Synthetic Cannabinoid 1-(4-cyanobutyl)-N-(2-phenylpropan-2-yl)-1H-indazole-3-carboxamide (CUMYL-4CN-BINACA) in Plant Material and Quantification in Post-Mortem Blood Samples

Abstract: In May 2016, a new type of synthetic indazole-3-carboxamide cannabinoid (CUMYL-4CN-BINACA) was detected in seized plant material submitted to the Istanbul Council of Forensic Medicine by the National Police Office. The major ingredient in this material was purified using preparative liquid chromatography, and its structure was identified using liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HR/MS), gas chromatography-electron ionization/mass spectrometry (GC-EI/MS), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of these 146 samples, 23% (33 samples) contained multiple SCRAs with one sample seized in Prison 1 on 28 November 2018 found to contain four SCRAs: 5F‐MDMB‐PINACA (3) (major), CUMYL‐4CN‐BINACA (10) (4.4% of 5F‐MDMB‐PINACA peak area), AMB‐FUBINACA (4) (4.1%), and 5F‐MDMB‐PICA (5) (1.7%). As no reference standard for CUMYL‐4CN‐BINACA (9) was available in our laboratory, this compound was identified by comparison of spectra (see supplementary information) with published GC–MS and UPLC‐QToF‐MS data . In 11 cases, these other SCRAs were present in very minor proportions (< 1% of major SCRA peak area) possibly indicating cross contamination prior to our analysis, whilst in 22 cases they were present in higher proportions, indicating more purposeful addition (Table ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these 146 samples, 23% (33 samples) contained multiple SCRAs with one sample seized in Prison 1 on 28 November 2018 found to contain four SCRAs: 5F‐MDMB‐PINACA (3) (major), CUMYL‐4CN‐BINACA (10) (4.4% of 5F‐MDMB‐PINACA peak area), AMB‐FUBINACA (4) (4.1%), and 5F‐MDMB‐PICA (5) (1.7%). As no reference standard for CUMYL‐4CN‐BINACA (9) was available in our laboratory, this compound was identified by comparison of spectra (see supplementary information) with published GC–MS and UPLC‐QToF‐MS data . In 11 cases, these other SCRAs were present in very minor proportions (< 1% of major SCRA peak area) possibly indicating cross contamination prior to our analysis, whilst in 22 cases they were present in higher proportions, indicating more purposeful addition (Table ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To interpret post‐mortem blood concentrations, it is sometimes useful to compare with those from the living or from post‐mortem cases not related to intoxication. To date, there are blood concentration values available from 2 papers: In blood samples from drug abuse suspects (it is assumed that these are ante‐mortem samples) 0.1 to 36.14 ng/mL CUMYL‐4CN‐BINACA was found ; in 11 post‐mortem samples, in which the only drug detected was CUMYL‐4CN‐BINACA, a range of 0.4 to 34.3 ng/mL was determined . For 5 of the fatal cases, cause of death was ruled “CUMYL‐4CN‐BINACA intoxication” and in these cases specifically the concentration range was 0.4 to 11.9 ng/mL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, there are blood concentration values available from 2 papers: In blood samples from drug abuse suspects (it is assumed that these are ante-mortem samples) 0.1 to 36.14 ng/mL CUMYL-4CN-BINACA was found 7; in 11 post-mortem samples, in which the only drug detected was CUMYL-4CN-BINACA, a range of 0.4 to 34.3 ng/mL was determined. 13 For 5 of the fatal cases, cause of death was ruled "CUMYL-4CN-BINACA intoxication" and in these cases specifically the concentration range was 0.4 to 11.9 ng/mL. These values suggest that there is an overlap of concentration ranges found in living people and in dead people.…”
Section: Autopsy Casesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…It continues to be a challenge for laboratories to develop methods which can detect the wide range of existing and new SCs in a broad range of biological matrices . Many laboratories analyze urine as a sample of choice, which necessitates metabolic studies to determine the major SC metabolites, as the parent compounds are often not detected in urine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 It continues to be a challenge for laboratories to develop methods which can detect the wide range of existing and new SCs in a broad range of biological matrices. [8][9][10] Many laboratories analyze urine as a sample of choice, 8,9 which necessitates metabolic studies to determine the major SC metabolites, [11][12][13][14] as the parent compounds are often not detected in urine. The analysis of SCs is further complicated by the fact that some are known to be unstable during storage, 15 and to be thermally labile.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%