2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.chempr.2020.10.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of the Electronic and Structural Dynamics of Catalytic Centers in Single-Fe-Atom Material

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

13
208
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 255 publications
(221 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
13
208
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the Fe‐N‐C obtained at 700°C, its out‐of‐plane FeN 4 sites with a small degree of Fe–N bond contraction that were identified as sites with optimal ORR performance (Onset potential [E onset ] of 0.98 V vs. RHE, half‐wave potential [ E 1/2 ] of 0.84 V vs. RHE, 0.5 M H 2 SO 4 ), even though contraction strain about FeN 4 is not energetically favorable for the catalyst. The N coordination number can also be varied to form defective MN x ( x = 2, 3, or 5) sites, leading to central metals with different electronic structures and different ORR activities 20,44–47 . However, it remains unclear whether FeN x ( x = 2, 3, or 5) structure with nitrogen vacancies or excess nitrogen relative to the traditional FeN 4 coordination can enhance ORR activity.…”
Section: Control Over Fen X  Active Sites In Fe‐n‐c Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the Fe‐N‐C obtained at 700°C, its out‐of‐plane FeN 4 sites with a small degree of Fe–N bond contraction that were identified as sites with optimal ORR performance (Onset potential [E onset ] of 0.98 V vs. RHE, half‐wave potential [ E 1/2 ] of 0.84 V vs. RHE, 0.5 M H 2 SO 4 ), even though contraction strain about FeN 4 is not energetically favorable for the catalyst. The N coordination number can also be varied to form defective MN x ( x = 2, 3, or 5) sites, leading to central metals with different electronic structures and different ORR activities 20,44–47 . However, it remains unclear whether FeN x ( x = 2, 3, or 5) structure with nitrogen vacancies or excess nitrogen relative to the traditional FeN 4 coordination can enhance ORR activity.…”
Section: Control Over Fen X  Active Sites In Fe‐n‐c Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fe‐N‐C materials free from metallic Fe nanoparticles 14,15 demonstrate outstanding ORR activity and durability, with the active Fe determined to exist in a porphyrin‐like N coordination environment (FeN 4 ) using advanced physical methods, including Mössbauer spectroscopy, X‐ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS), and high‐angle annular dark‐field scanning transmission electron microscope. Density functional theory calculations (DFT) added further evidence that FeN 4 sites were indeed very active sites for ORR 14,16–22 . Although deeper knowledge is emerging about the true active site of Fe‐N‐C material for ORR (i.e., porphyrin‐like iron single‐atom sites), the ORR performance of Fe‐N‐C materials remains generally inferior to commercial Pt/C catalysts 23,24 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 10–13 ] Single atoms of iron coordinated with nitrogen (e.g., FeN 4 ) moieties in a carbon matrix are commonly recognized as the real active sites for absorbing O 2 and catalyzing the subsequent ORR kinetics. [ 14–19 ] The FeNC materials can be prepared by the high‐temperature pyrolysis of C‐, N‐ and Fe‐containing precursors. [ 2,20–25 ] Nanocrystals of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (ZIF‐8) modified with Fe have proven as highly promising precursors of FeNC electrocatalysts due to their ability to yield FeN 4 sites and generate porous nanostructures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liu et al reported the N-FeN 4 C 10 moiety as an active site by the spin-crossover-involved ORR mechanism. [6] FrØdØric Jaouen et al showed low or intermediate spin FeN 4 C 10 sites are more durable after al ong time operation in the fuel cell. [7] Spin configurations may be as ap ossible catalytic descriptor linking the catalyst structure and the electrocatalytic activity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%