Identification of the best material-energy-climate compatibility for five ecological houses and the contribution of their impact sources to the overall balance

Kaoula, Dalel; Bouchair, Ammar

doi:10.1016/j.scs.2019.101781

Cited by 16 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Since 2012, Sweden and Norway have a certification system in place for the joint electricity market. Other research studies also point out that the family house built using natural green materials is characterized by negative emission of CO 2 in the product stage [6,25,26]. The study [25] states that a family house from conventional materials shares the potential of GWP by 61% more compared to a wooden house, which is caused by the phase of operational energy (B6).…”

Section: Results Of Life Cycle Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Life Cycle Assessment and Indoor Environmental Quality of Wooden Family Houses

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article analyzes in detail the impact of wooden houses on the environment using the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology and at the same time evaluates the indoor environmental quality (IEQ) in these houses. The investigated detached family houses had a wooden structure. The first one had a bearing system made of a wooden frame; other materials were conventional. The second house was built entirely of log wood. Given the high risk of greenhouse gas emissions, the concentration of which in the atmosphere is causing global climate change, the global warming potential (GWP) indicator is crucial. According to results, the family house built entirely of wood and with a biomass boiler significantly reduces CO2 emissions and is therefore considered from the LCA point of view as a more suitable alternative compared to a house with a wooden frame structure. The building materials with the highest share involved in the creation of GWP include concrete structures (38–48%), ceramic roof tiles (33%) and plasterboard (15%). Plasterboard cladding (55%), concrete structures (17–19%), oriented strand board OSB (9–22%), impregnated wooden structures (31–52%) and plastic windows (9%) are the most involved in acidification potential (AP) and eutrophication potential (EP). Plasterboard structures (21%), impregnated wood materials (47.4%), reinforced concrete structures (12%) and mineral wool and roof tiles significantly contribute to the creation of photochemical ozone creation potential (POCP) and ozone depletion potential (ODP). The indoor environmental quality was evaluated through short-term measurements of basic physico-chemical parameters. Since both houses have different characteristics, the aim of this monitoring was to evaluate the actual state of IEQ in selected wooden houses under real conditions. Based on the recorded results, it can be stated that neither presented wooden house, in terms of thermal-humidity microclimate, concentration of CO2 and particulate matter, represents an environment with a negative impact on their occupants. With regards to volatile organic compounds (VOCs), the increased concentrations of xylenes and tetrachlorethylene in the log house were probably caused by the application of impregnation and protective coatings six months before monitoring. In this case, the concentration of tetrachloroethene, which is considered a potential carcinogen, was six times higher than the legislative limit. For VOCs, such as limonene, isobutylene and n-butylacetate, which were found in the wooden frame house, no limits are set. The legislative limits for xylenes and tetrachlorethylene in this house have not been exceeded, and therefore the IEQ cannot yet be considered harmful for health. The presence of all the mentioned VOCs in the interior air of the wooden frame house is more related to the activities of occupants, as this house has been inhabited for several years.

show abstract

Section: Results Of Life Cycle Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Life Cycle Assessment and Indoor Environmental Quality of Wooden Family Houses

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In addition, nearly half of the annual energy use at the global level is attributed to the built environment [3]. The construction industry has posed significant negative impacts on the environment not only in terms of depletion of natural resources, but also in terms of overall pollution and global warming [4].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Review of the Building Information Modelling (BIM) Implementation in the Context of Building Energy Assessment

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In recent years, many researchers across the world have addressed the implementation of Building Information Modelling (BIM) in the energy assessment of the built environment. However, several potential issues still need to be resolved in order to utilise the benefits provided by BIM to a maximum degree. To fill this gap, a systematic literature review is conducted in this study to critically investigate the utilisation of BIM tools in energy assessment. To achieve the above-mentioned objective, after shortlisting the relevant papers published hitherto, using keyword searching, a systematic review was undertaken, including the application of BIM in the contexts of different countries, types of BIM tools, BIM and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) integration, energy affiliations, stakeholders’ involvement and their roles, uncertainty, and sensitivity analysis. The outcomes show the most widely used and effective BIM tools in different types of construction projects in various countries. The review of the literature clearly shows that BIM tools can effectively be used in the assessment of energy performance of buildings. The article gives insight to engineers, architecture, and decision makers to carefully select appropriate BIM tools in terms of energy assessment.

show abstract

“…In the light of the growing success of the concept of sustainable development and its variations, numerous reflections and research works are focusing on urban sustainability at the city, neighbourhood and even building levels (Ben Cheikh & Bouchair, 2004;Cherqui, 2005;Emelianoff, 2007;D Kaoula & Bouchair, 2018;Dalel Kaoula & Bouchair, 2019, 2020Yepez-Salmon, 2011). Thus, confirming that it has become inevitable to reshape traditional urban policies and strategies.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Application of the INDI Model of the HQE²R Approach to Assess the Sustainability of a Neighbourhood: Case of Jijel City in Algeria

Roula

Bouchair

2021

Int J. of BES

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Increased interest in developing sustainable urban areas has become an important feature in recent urban development studies. In fact, the question of neighbourhood sustainability assessment is a major part of this interest. Accordingly, a number of methods and tools for evaluating sustainable development projects in the urban areas have emerged particularly at district level. However, the urban development in Algeria is far from having achieved a clearly defined frame. This work therefore aims to demonstrate the contribution of sustainability assessment to any development project as well as the importance of the district level as a lever for local sustainable development. For this study, the district of the “Beach” formerly known as “Casino” located Jijel city centre, in Algeria, is chosen as a case study. We will focus on the assessment of its current state in relation to the principles and objectives of sustainable development, through a shared diagnosis of the Heritage, environmental Quality, Diversity, Integration, social Link (HQDIL) method and the INDicators Impact (INDI) model of the High Environmental Quality (HQE2R) approach. Along the same lines, a comparison between its initial state and the proposed development project by the land use plan study was made. The results obtained enabled us to draw up a detailed representation of each indicator on a sustainability scale. This led to deduce the degree of sustainability of the “Beach” district, thus to define the weak points, the strong points and to lead to a reflection on the issues and the action plan to be taken into account during a sustainable intervention on the latter. This work provides an aid to decision-making for researchers and urban actors, in order to orient urban development or renewal projects towards sustainability

show abstract

Identification of the best material-energy-climate compatibility for five ecological houses and the contribution of their impact sources to the overall balance

Cited by 16 publications

References 22 publications

Life Cycle Assessment and Indoor Environmental Quality of Wooden Family Houses

Life Cycle Assessment and Indoor Environmental Quality of Wooden Family Houses

Review of the Building Information Modelling (BIM) Implementation in the Context of Building Energy Assessment

Application of the INDI Model of the HQE²R Approach to Assess the Sustainability of a Neighbourhood: Case of Jijel City in Algeria

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About