2023
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-022-10801-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of suitable zones and sites for rainwater harvesting using GIS and multicriteria decision analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The final PRWH suitability map, shown in Figure 9, reflects the suitability levels of the RWH site. For instance, the most suitable sites for RWH are located in areas with higher rainfall (>450 mm), with slopes extending from 0 to 10, and in large drainage density areas (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13) because rainfall and drainage density had the highest weight factors, followed by slope. These results agree with the assumption of factor suitability level allocation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The final PRWH suitability map, shown in Figure 9, reflects the suitability levels of the RWH site. For instance, the most suitable sites for RWH are located in areas with higher rainfall (>450 mm), with slopes extending from 0 to 10, and in large drainage density areas (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13) because rainfall and drainage density had the highest weight factors, followed by slope. These results agree with the assumption of factor suitability level allocation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The challenge of water scarcity has been intensified by climate change, global warming, and population expansion, leading to critical shortages of water resources worldwide [6,7]. In response to this, rainwater harvesting (RWH), an age-old practice involving the collection, storage, and reuse of rainwater, has regained prominence as a viable solution for water supply in various regions across the globe [8]. Water is the most significant component of all food availability and nutrition determinants, such as agricultural production, energy, poverty reduction, economic growth, and survival [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various methodologies have been developed for selecting potential RWH sites, which include remote sensing (RS) and geographical information systems (GIS) in combination with various multicriteria decision analysis and hydrological modeling approaches [9,16,17]. However, the application of RS and GIS along with multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) has gained importance as it provides a systematic methodology for the complex problems to locate potential regions for soil and water conservation structures and artificial/traditional GW recharge techniques [18][19][20][21][22]. Further, reviewers have identified various types of discrete MCDA techniques, such as multi-attribute utility theory (MAUT), simple additive weighting (SAW), analytic network process (ANP), technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPIIS), preference ranking organization method for enrichment of evaluations (PROMETHEE) and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RWH represents a comprehensive approach to supporting agriculture in regions with limited precipitation during the period of crop growth and scarce water resources [13]. For easier and more cost-effective access to water for irrigation purposes, it is important to scientifically identify appropriate locations for RWH [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%