2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11709-020-0686-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of structural parameters and boundary conditions using a minimum number of measurement points

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the context of little difference in the calculation results of combination modes 1, 4, 5, to simplify the calculation process, the first combination with equal weigh factors (each takes 0.1) was adopted in this article. The further discussion of weight factor combination given by Karimpour and Rahmatalla 61 is of great reference value. The optimal convergence curve is depicted in Figure 9(b), indicating that the computation has gradually converged, and that the global optimal search capability can be further improved.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In the context of little difference in the calculation results of combination modes 1, 4, 5, to simplify the calculation process, the first combination with equal weigh factors (each takes 0.1) was adopted in this article. The further discussion of weight factor combination given by Karimpour and Rahmatalla 61 is of great reference value. The optimal convergence curve is depicted in Figure 9(b), indicating that the computation has gradually converged, and that the global optimal search capability can be further improved.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…After simulating the initial bridge FEM based on the asbuilt blueprint, it is required to perform structural model updating to validate it; model updating techniques are used to make a fair representative of the real bridge from its in situ information [29][30][31][32]. For bridge structures, the most important parameters that must be updated are boundary conditions and material properties using many available advanced techniques [33][34][35][36].…”
Section: Stage (1): Construct Calibrated Femmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To successfully implement the WOP for real-world bridge LR, the first and essential practical step is to perform the structural model updating process to construct a fair representation of the bridge by its FEM as explained in the WOP first stage. Although, in general, any available robust model updating technique can be exploited to perform WOP's first stage, detailed descriptions of the model updating techniques used in this article are available in the references [29,30]. After simulating the initial FEM based on the as-built blueprints of a bridge, the analyst must calibrate its FEM either with in situ NDT data or visual inspections based on AASHTO guidelines for field inspection.…”
Section: Recommendation For Practical Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a primary challenge in the solution procedure is the requirement for repetitive evaluations of the simulation model (e.g. finite element model), which can incur substantial computational costs, particularly when the model is intricate and time-consuming (Biegler et al, 2011;Yan and et al, 2014;Karimpour and Rahmatalla, 2020;Vu-Bac et al, 2016). For instance, in dam structure applications, Ji et al (2020) used the deep neural network (DNN) as the surrogate model to accelerate the optimization process of the deep Q-network (DQN) algorithm for mechanical parameter identification of hydraulic engineering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To alleviate this issue, surrogate models are widely applied in this field (Ghasemi et al. , 2014; Karimpour and Rahmatalla, 2020; Vu-Bac et al. , 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%