A compehtive lmmunoassay for the detection of spnng viraema of carp vlrus (SVCV) antibodies in fish was developed in order to screen fish stocks for previous exposure to the virus SVCV has been isolated from different fish species and the use of a competitive immunoassay overcomes the requirement of standard immunoassays for antisera prepared against the immunoglobulin of each species under test instead, the test fish serum competes with an antiserum against SVCV for binding sites on the virus The competitive assay was developed and tested using sera from common carp containing antibodies that had been induced either experimentally, or as a result of field exposure to the virus When immunoassay results were compared with results of virus neutral~sation tests on the sera from 2 groups of experimentally challenged fish there was no correlation between the 2 techniques Slmilar results were obtained with 4 groups of field-collected sera One g] oup had 34 6 % neutralisation-positive sera, but 88 5 % immunoassay-positive sera The 3 remaining groups were negative by virus neutralisation, but each group had a small number (11 4 8 3 and 11 5 % respectively) of irnrnunoassay-pos~tive sera The competitive immunoassay thus appears to be more sensitive than the neutralisation test The assay has potent~al for use in large-scale screening of fish populations but further validation on a wider range of sera is needed KEY WORDS. Spring viraemia of carp virus . Antibody detection . Competitive immunoassay
INTRODUCTIONIn recent years there has been a growing interest in the health screening of fish by means of detecting specific antibodies against fish pathogens (Dixon 1989, Groot & Dixon 1989, Hattenberger-Baudouy et al. 198913, J~rrgensen et al. 1991. This is partly because of national and international legislation or policy on fish health monitoring. In addition, the wider use of immunoassay techniques employing 96-well microplates makes large-scale screening for antibodies feasible and, particularly in the case of viruses, more economical than standard pathogenisolation methods. With certain fish virus diseases, notably those caused by rhabdoviruses, it is not possible to isolate virus from carrier fish at all times of the year. For instance, infectious haematopoietic necrosis virus (IHNV) can usually only be isolated from clinically diseased fry or from adults at spawning time (Mulcahy et al. 1984); viral haemorrhagic septicaemia virus (VHSV) can only be isolated from infected fish for a short period after the onset of clinical symptoms at high water temperatures (e.g. 20°C), whereas at low water temperatures (e.g. 5"C), the virus can be isolated for a much greater period ( J~r g e n s e n 1992); and spring viraemia of carp virus (SVCV) can usually only b e detected during outbreaks of clinical disease (Dresenkamp 1986) which predominantly occur at water temperatures between 11 and 17°C (Fijan 1988). However, it has been demonstrated that fish populations previously exposed to a virus could be identified by a n antib...