2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2003.11.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of spectrally similar materials using the USGS Tetracorder algorithm: the calcite–epidote–chlorite problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although both spectral analysis techniques employ spectral unmixing at their core, the effectiveness is limited -especially when the number of contributing minerals is high and when minerals have overlapping features. For example, the chlorite--epidote--calcite assemblage, which is common in porphyry systems, will have overlapping features in the region of 2340 nm (Dalton et al 2004). At Batu Hijau, calcite is relatively rare and so presumably has little effect, however epidote is abundant, especially as the secondary mineral in chlorite--dominated spectra.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although both spectral analysis techniques employ spectral unmixing at their core, the effectiveness is limited -especially when the number of contributing minerals is high and when minerals have overlapping features. For example, the chlorite--epidote--calcite assemblage, which is common in porphyry systems, will have overlapping features in the region of 2340 nm (Dalton et al 2004). At Batu Hijau, calcite is relatively rare and so presumably has little effect, however epidote is abundant, especially as the secondary mineral in chlorite--dominated spectra.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An argillic zone characterized by kaolinite and alunite collectively exhibits a secondary Al-OH absorption feature corresponding with ASTER band 5 ( Figure 4). A propylitic zone with epidote, chlorite and calcite displays absorption features coinciding with ASTER band 8 ( Figure 4) [1][2][3][4][5]47,48,[50][51][52][53][54]. [46].…”
Section: Results: Aster Spectral and Spatial Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only small spots of epidote and chlorite can be located within the blue patches of calcite in Figure 16. This is an apparent problem of results from expert systems, which has been described by Dalton et al [54]. They used synthetic mixtures of epidote, chlorite and calcite to improve mineral mapping results of the USGS Tetracorder [54].…”
Section: Results From the Haib River Deposit Using The Gfz Spectral Lmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an apparent problem of results from expert systems, which has been described by Dalton et al [54]. They used synthetic mixtures of epidote, chlorite and calcite to improve mineral mapping results of the USGS Tetracorder [54]. A similar approach was also used to produce the EnGeoMAP 2.0 result of Figure 17.…”
Section: Results From the Haib River Deposit Using The Gfz Spectral Lmentioning
confidence: 99%