1987
DOI: 10.1520/jfs12340j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of Skulls by Video Superimposition

Abstract: A method of matching skulls with photographic portraits or impressions of the face in clay by video superimposition is described. Two different practical cases are presented. The first one deals with the identification of a skull of a six-year-old girl, the second with the identification of the skull of the famous Swiss Pedagogue Johann Heinrich Pestalozzi, who died about 160 years ago. The advantages and versatility of this method are shown; also the setup of the equipment and the working technique.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The technique of superimposition as a means of identification has a long history (Grüner et al, 1959;Grüner, 1993). photographic and video superimposition has proven to be very successful in the identification of unknown individuals and the courts have accepted identifications made by this technique as reliable (Chandra Sekharan, 1971;Colonna et al, 1980;Cai and Lan, 1982;Dorion,1983;Robert, 1983;Bassian et al, 1986;Iten, 1987;Cai et al, 1989;Helmer, 1989;Cai and Lan, 1993;Seta and Yoshino, 1993;Maples et al, 1994;Shahrom, 1996;Taylor and Brown, 1998;Jayaprakash et al, 2001). With the availability of current technology the process takes about one hour and can effectively demonstrate consistencies and inconsistencies between a skull and photograph used for comparison.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technique of superimposition as a means of identification has a long history (Grüner et al, 1959;Grüner, 1993). photographic and video superimposition has proven to be very successful in the identification of unknown individuals and the courts have accepted identifications made by this technique as reliable (Chandra Sekharan, 1971;Colonna et al, 1980;Cai and Lan, 1982;Dorion,1983;Robert, 1983;Bassian et al, 1986;Iten, 1987;Cai et al, 1989;Helmer, 1989;Cai and Lan, 1993;Seta and Yoshino, 1993;Maples et al, 1994;Shahrom, 1996;Taylor and Brown, 1998;Jayaprakash et al, 2001). With the availability of current technology the process takes about one hour and can effectively demonstrate consistencies and inconsistencies between a skull and photograph used for comparison.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is very likely, on the other hand, that acquaintances have photos of the presumed victim. The use of superimposition methods at this point becomes crucial [22][23][24] as they may be the only methods which may allow positive identification. Cranio-facial identification has some limits, as mentioned above.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrarily, freedom to arbitrarily manipulate the skull image forward and backward would be restrained when following the foundational standard in superimposition, which prescribes the use of anatomical points lying on two different planes of the face image to serve as registration points to align with homologous points in the skull image: the outer angle of the eye on the frontal plane and the other, the tragus on the rear plane of the face image to align with the respective anatomically related points in the skull image viz. Whitnall's tubercle in the orbit on the frontal plane and the auditory meatus on the rear plane (2,9,10,14,(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21). A recent experiment that compared the generation of false-positive matches when applying two different methods for orientating skull images-one relying on the frontal plane landmarks alone and the other that also included the tragus-auditory meatus relationship-confirmed that mere reliance on the frontal plane landmarks increases false positives during superimposition such as one skull image matching with five face images of living individuals (10).…”
Section: Issues In Orientating 3d Skull Images Merely Relying On Fronmentioning
confidence: 99%