2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2008.09.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of shark and ray fins using DNA barcoding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
149
0
10

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 203 publications
(162 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
149
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…The dominant families, however, varies among biogeographical provinces as Sundaland is dominated by the Cyprinidae (231 species; changes during ontogeny, fish identification is not an easy task. After almost a decade, it has become evident that DNA barcoding presents several advantages compared to morphological characters for species identification including: (1) intraspecific phenotypic variation often overlaps that of sister taxa in nature, which can lead to incorrect identifications or species delineations [21,22], (2) DNA barcodes are effective whatever the life stages under scrutiny [23,24] or available biological materials for identification [25,26], (3) spectacular levels of cryptic diversity have been frequently reported using DNA barcoding [21,[27][28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dominant families, however, varies among biogeographical provinces as Sundaland is dominated by the Cyprinidae (231 species; changes during ontogeny, fish identification is not an easy task. After almost a decade, it has become evident that DNA barcoding presents several advantages compared to morphological characters for species identification including: (1) intraspecific phenotypic variation often overlaps that of sister taxa in nature, which can lead to incorrect identifications or species delineations [21,22], (2) DNA barcodes are effective whatever the life stages under scrutiny [23,24] or available biological materials for identification [25,26], (3) spectacular levels of cryptic diversity have been frequently reported using DNA barcoding [21,[27][28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high price of shark in stimulates the practice of inning, in which the ins are extracted and the shark carcass is discarded. The thriving Asian market for shark in stimulates high prices for the byproduct and favors predatory ishery practices [27,28,32,33].…”
Section: Elasmobranchs and Isheriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular identiication is now used widely in research on elasmobranchs, based on a variety of genetic techniques [14,32,[60][61][62][63][64]. The most widely used approach, which is both simple and efective and provides a good diagnosis of most animal taxa, is DNA barcoding [12], which is based on the analysis of a small fragment of the mitochondrial Cytochrome Oxidase subunit I (COI) gene of approximately 648 nucleotides.…”
Section: Elasmobranchs and Isheriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accumulating data already support applications of DNA barcoding which reveal market substitution (Wong and Hanner, 2008;Carvalho et al 2011a;Hanner et al 2011a) and enhancing our understanding of fisheries exploitation (Holmes et al 2009;Doukakis et al 2011). Yet the broad realization of benefits is predicated on a sustained effort to complete the construction of reference sequence library, which is the major focus of many articles in this special issue.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%