2010
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.110.116111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of Selection Signatures in Cattle Breeds Selected for Dairy Production

Abstract: The genomics revolution has spurred the undertaking of HapMap studies of numerous species, allowing for population genomics to increase the understanding of how selection has created genetic differences between subspecies populations. The objectives of this study were to (1) develop an approach to detect signatures of selection in subsets of phenotypically similar breeds of livestock by comparing single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) diversity between the subset and a larger population, (2) verify this method i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
133
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
5
133
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of identified selective sweeps varied across different studies, depending on methodological approach and analysed populations. A large number of selective sweeps was presented by Stella et al (2010) for five specialized dairy cattle breeds (215 regions), and also by Druet et Mancini et al (2014) for Italian breeds. Despite the relatively lower proportion of selective sweeps identified for the breeds analysed in our study compared to others, the results indicated that the approach proposed by Duforet-Frebourg et al (2016) could be a perspective alternative for the identification of selection signatures not only in human but also in cattle.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of identified selective sweeps varied across different studies, depending on methodological approach and analysed populations. A large number of selective sweeps was presented by Stella et al (2010) for five specialized dairy cattle breeds (215 regions), and also by Druet et Mancini et al (2014) for Italian breeds. Despite the relatively lower proportion of selective sweeps identified for the breeds analysed in our study compared to others, the results indicated that the approach proposed by Duforet-Frebourg et al (2016) could be a perspective alternative for the identification of selection signatures not only in human but also in cattle.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In farm animals, they have been investigated in the framework of the HapMap project and re-sequencing projects (e.g. The Bovine HapMap Stella et al, 2010). In chicken, whole genome re-sequencing of wild and domestic animals identified 58 genomic regions under selection containing genes likely involved in the domestication process.…”
Section: Detection Of Selection Signatures In the Goat Genomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of identified selective sweeps varied across different studies, depending on methodological approach and analysed populations. A high number of selective sweeps was presented by Stella et al (2010) for five specialized dairy cattle breeds (215 regions) and also by Druet et al (2013) for 12 breeds of different production type (147 regions). The much lower proportion of selective footprints (16 regions) was found by Flori et al (2009) for French dairy cattle breeds and Mancini et al (2014) for Italian breeds.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%