Identification of salt-tolerant barley genotypes using multiple-traits index and yield performance at the early growth and maturity stages

Abstract

Background Salinity is one of the major limiting abiotic stresses that decrease crop production worldwide. To recommend genotypes for cultivation under saline stress conditions, a comprehensive understanding of the genetic basis and plant responses to this stress is needed. In the present study, a total of 20 barley genotypes were investigated to identify potential salt-tolerant genotypes, both at the early growth stage using a hydroponic system, and in adult plants under field conditions. For these purposes, the multi-trait genotype-ideotype distance index (MGIDI) was used to identify salt-tolerant barley genotypes at the seedling stage, and the weighted average of absolute scores (WAASB) index was used to identify the high-yielding and stable genotypes in adult plant stage. At the early growth stage, barley seedlings were treated with two salinity levels: 0 mM NaCl (as control conditions) and 200 mM NaCl (as stress conditions) for 30 days, and during this period different growth and physiological traits were measured. Besides, the yield performance and stability of the investigated barley genotypes were evaluated across five environments during the 2018–2020 cropping seasons. Results Salinity stress significantly decreased growth and physiological traits in all seedling plants; however, some salt-tolerant genotypes showed minimal reduction in the measured traits. Multivariate analysis grouped the measured traits and genotypes into different clusters. In the early growth stage, the G12, G14, G6, G7, and G16 were selected as the most salt-tolerant genotypes using MGIDI index. In the multi-environment trials experiment, AMMI analysis showed that grain yields of the tested barley genotypes were influenced by the environment (E), genotype (G), and GE interaction. Based on the weighted average of absolute scores of the genotype index (WAASB) and other stability statistics, G7, G8, G14, and G16 were selected as superior genotypes. Conclusion Together the MGIDI and WAASB indices revealed that three genotypes—G7, G14 and G16—can be recommended as new genetic resources for improving and stabilizing grain yield in barley programs for the moderate climate and saline regions of Iran. Our results suggest that using the MGIDI index in the early growth stage can accelerate screening nurseries in barley breeding programs. Besides, the WAASB index can be used as a useful stability measurement for identify high-yielding and stable genotypes in multi-environment trials.

A dataset on multi-trait selection approaches for screening desirable wild relatives of wheat

“…Indeed MGIDI focuses on the selection of best genotypes where multiple traits have been measured. The use efficiency of this index in identifying the superior genotypes was also reported in several studies [15] , [16] , [17] .…”

Unraveling Heat Tolerance in Upland Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Using Univariate and Multivariate Analysis

“…A correlation matrix is used to study the dependency of variables upon each other for better phenotypes to give improved yields ( Li and Ji, 2005 ; Pour-Aboughadareh et al, 2021 ). The positively associated traits TSP, BW, POD, CAT, Chl a and b, and Car were in line with earlier reports in cotton ( Wan et al, 2007 ).…”

A Study on Genotype-by-Environment Interaction Analysis for Agronomic Traits of Maize Genotypes Across Huang-Huai-Hai Region in China

“…In this study, Figure 6: The rankings with genotypic grain yield and stability parameters are based on loading graphs obtained from principal component analysis among different genotype ranking evaluation methods, MGIDI and FAI-BLUP, Smith-Hazel, MTSI had coselected that the number of genotypes were 3, 1 and 2, respectively. Since there is a better consistency with other genotype ranking techniques, MGIDI will have more applications in future METs in terms of genotype rankings [40].…”