2015
DOI: 10.3109/0284186x.2014.1001873
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of relevant ICF (International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health) categories in lymphedema patients: A cross-sectional study

Abstract: Background . To describe functioning and health of lymphedema patients and to identify their most common problems using the International Classifi cation of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as part of the preparatory studies for the development of ICF Core Sets for lymphedema. Methods . Cross-sectional study in a population of lymphedema patients (n ϭ 200), undergoing treatment in a Dutch lymphedema-specialized hospital. The second-level categories of the ICF were used to collect information on patient… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although a scoring of "1" would be enough to classify a specific aspect of functioning or environmental factor as "mildly impaired/barrier/facilitator", a more conservative cut-off was chosen to avoid margins of error (e.g., a specific challenge might exist in daily life, but not be significantly impairing enough to affect functioning level). The choice of a 10% cut-off was based on results from previous ICF clinical studies [45], and it was also used for ratings indicating strengths. Absolute (n) and relative (%) frequencies of difficulties and strengths are reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a scoring of "1" would be enough to classify a specific aspect of functioning or environmental factor as "mildly impaired/barrier/facilitator", a more conservative cut-off was chosen to avoid margins of error (e.g., a specific challenge might exist in daily life, but not be significantly impairing enough to affect functioning level). The choice of a 10% cut-off was based on results from previous ICF clinical studies [45], and it was also used for ratings indicating strengths. Absolute (n) and relative (%) frequencies of difficulties and strengths are reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a Dutch ICF working group agreed on the ICF core sets for lymphoedema. [45][46][47][48] Devoogdt et al 44 developed an ICF-based questionnaire in a Dutch population of lymphoedema of the lower legs. This questionnaire is complementary to the LYMQOL: whereas the ICF emphasizes the impact of the disease on patients' functioning, the LYMQOL focuses on other items of quality of life, such as its impact on daily activities, emotions and body image.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a scoring of “1” would be enough to classify a specific aspect of functioning or environmental factor as “mildly impaired/barrier/facilitator”, a more conservative cut-off was chosen to avoid margins of error (e.g., a specific problem might exist in daily life, but not be significantly impairing enough to affect functioning level). The choice of a 10% cut-off was based on results from previous ICF clinical studies (e.g., Vierhoff et al 2015 ). The same cut-off was also applied to ratings that indicated above-average skills (strengths).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%