2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of rail-sleeper-ballast system through time-domain Markov chain Monte Carlo-based Bayesian approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several factors influencing the effectiveness and practicability of ballast monitoring methods within the industrial framework, thereby their adoption by railway infrastructure managers. The following performance metrics have been selected to carry out a comparison with other methods proposed in the literature, such as direct methods (DM) and highfidelity model-based methods (HFMM) [7], [9], [19]- [21], as well as with the current industrial practice based on the track geometry measurements (TGM) [56]:…”
Section: Comparative Analysis With Alternative Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There are several factors influencing the effectiveness and practicability of ballast monitoring methods within the industrial framework, thereby their adoption by railway infrastructure managers. The following performance metrics have been selected to carry out a comparison with other methods proposed in the literature, such as direct methods (DM) and highfidelity model-based methods (HFMM) [7], [9], [19]- [21], as well as with the current industrial practice based on the track geometry measurements (TGM) [56]:…”
Section: Comparative Analysis With Alternative Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Employing model-based techniques is the third approach to railway track degradation analysis. A notable research effort has been conducted by Lam et al [19]- [21] for detection of ballast damage based on a combination of high complexity mechanical models and measured vibration data in model updating frameworks. The feasibility of quantifying ballast damage characteristics (location and level of stiffness reduction) in an artificially damaged system was studied using deterministic [19] and Bayesian [20] model updating techniques.…”
Section: A Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…34 Beck and Au 35 used Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method to generate samples to approximate the posterior distribution. Lam et al 36 introduced a novel stopping criterion with MCMC-based Bayesian model to ensure the accuracy of the calculated posterior distribution. Pepi et al 37 used a modified version of the MCMC method to estimate the posterior marginal probability density function of the selected model parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lam et al solved this problem by proposing a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC)‐based Bayesian model updating method in which samples were drawn from the posterior PDF at multiple levels extended from Beck and Au . By constructing a bridge PDF at each sampling level, such that the PDFs finally converged to the target posterior PDF in a controlled manner, this method was successfully applied in a series of applications . To investigate the uncertainties in Bayesian model updating, the transitional MCMC algorithm is developed in Ching and Chen, and the main difference of transitional MCMC with the method presented in Lam et al is a different strategy of controlling the samples in each sampling level to approach the important regions of posterior PDF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%