Identification of quantitative trait loci for resistance against soybean sudden death syndrome caused by Fusarium tucumaniae

Yamanaka, Naoki; Fuentes, Francisco Horacio; Gilli, Javier Ramon; Watanabe, Satoshi; Harada, Kyuya; Ban, Takayuki; Abdelnoor, R. V.; Nepomuceno, Alexandre Lima; Homma, Yukihiko

doi:10.1590/s0100-204x2006000900006

Cited by 7 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…5) SDS14-4, qDX005 ss245747167-ss245786667 9.20–10.00 cM/8.50–11.70 cM Field test (IL, US) F5:7 (94) 0.01–0.04% DX - Anderson et al ( 2015 ) SDS15-8 BARC-059081–15,595 to BARC-065229–19,273 57.79–78.44 cM (35,367,094–37,815,203 a2) Growth chamber/isolates Clinton 1B, Scott F2II 1a and Scott B2 F7 derived RIL (200) 7.0% Root feeding LS94-3207 Swaminathan et al ( 2016 ) RSDS3 Satt545 (36,463,225 a2) Greenhouse test/ F. tucumaniae sp. nov. MJ161 F8 derived (156) 9.3% DX Moshidou Gong 503 Yamanaka et al ( 2006 ) qRfv06-01 MLG C2 (Chr. 6) di5, qRfs4 Satt371 4.4 cM (49,760,138 a2) Field test (IL, US) RIL (100); F2:3 (321) 12.1% DI Essex Abdelmajid et al ( 2007 ), Luckew et al ( 2013 ), Chang et al ( 2018 ) SDS14-6, qDX007 ss246087580-ss246092064 7.20–7.50 cM Field test (IL, US) F5:7 (94) 0.6% DX – Anderson et al ( 2015 ), Chang et al ( 2018 ) qDX008 ss246091245-ss246092064 7.20–7.30 cM Field test (IL, US) …”

Section: Section III Soybean Resistance To Fungal Diseasesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Breeding for disease resistance in soybean: a global perspective

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Key message This review provides a comprehensive atlas of QTLs, genes, and alleles conferring resistance to 28 important diseases in all major soybean production regions in the world. Abstract Breeding disease-resistant soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] varieties is a common goal for soybean breeding programs to ensure the sustainability and growth of soybean production worldwide. However, due to global climate change, soybean breeders are facing strong challenges to defeat diseases. Marker-assisted selection and genomic selection have been demonstrated to be successful methods in quickly integrating vertical resistance or horizontal resistance into improved soybean varieties, where vertical resistance refers to R genes and major effect QTLs, and horizontal resistance is a combination of major and minor effect genes or QTLs. This review summarized more than 800 resistant loci/alleles and their tightly linked markers for 28 soybean diseases worldwide, caused by nematodes, oomycetes, fungi, bacteria, and viruses. The major breakthroughs in the discovery of disease resistance gene atlas of soybean were also emphasized which include: (1) identification and characterization of vertical resistance genes reside rhg1 and Rhg4 for soybean cyst nematode, and exploration of the underlying regulation mechanisms through copy number variation and (2) map-based cloning and characterization of Rps11 conferring resistance to 80% isolates of Phytophthora sojae across the USA. In this review, we also highlight the validated QTLs in overlapping genomic regions from at least two studies and applied a consistent naming nomenclature for these QTLs. Our review provides a comprehensive summary of important resistant genes/QTLs and can be used as a toolbox for soybean improvement. Finally, the summarized genetic knowledge sheds light on future directions of accelerated soybean breeding and translational genomics studies.

show abstract

Section: Section III Soybean Resistance To Fungal Diseasesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Breeding for disease resistance in soybean: a global perspective

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…5) include delayed planting [39,123,135], planting SDS tolerant varieties [102,108], fall tillage [135,137], crop rotation [1,104,137,142], modifying agronomic practices like row spacing and seeding rate [123], fungicide seed treatments [52,72,82,130,131,155], seed treatments with a combination of fungicides, systemic insecticides and biological(s) [2,155], seed treatment with bacteria and fungi based biocontrol agents [43,75,87,129], preplant or foliar applied potassium chloride with fungicides [88], cultural and biological control [4], exploring potential untapped resistance sources in perennial Glycine spp. to improve resistance in soybean [33] and recovering SDS infected plants [79] similar to sorghum and pearl millet [120,121], plant resistance, variety selection, adjusting planting dates, crop rotation, seed treatment with bio-fungicide [149], identification of quantitative trait loci [145], genomic approaches to molecular breeding of resistance [46], integrated approaches [34], clean harvest of corn and soybean [84,151] and genetic engineering along with other traditional management options may be needed as integrated approaches to manage SDS [32].…”

Section: Management Options Of Sdsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sudden death syndrome - a growing threat of losses in soybeans.

Navi¹,

Yang²

2016

CABI Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sudden death syndrome (SDS) caused by Fusarium virguliforme is one of the major yield-limiting soil borne diseases of soybean (Glycine max). The SDS has been reported from 21 U.S. states and is known to occur in Africa, North America, and South America. In the U.S. the losses due to SDS was estimated at $3.06 billion for a period from 1988 to 2010. Since 1983, several management approaches have been investigated to reduce SDS and yet, continued efforts are necessary to develop long term disease management programs and to sustain disease below economic threshold levels. Integrating available control measures is an option, but adaptability and real-world assessments are equally important. Support of several funding agencies to better understand the disease in identifying suitable control measures to reduce yield losses in commercial cultivations has been indispensable in accomplishing these goals. In spite of sustained efforts, SDS continued to spread within the U.S. and reported in seven other countries since its first report in 1971.Comprehensive reviews have previously been published on this disease by Roy et al. [98], Leandro et al. [58], and Hartman et al. [32]. In this review, updated information on geographic distribution and economic significance of SDS, epidemiology, factors affecting SDS, and management options for SDS including screening techniques have been compiled. Also, discussed significant gaps in use of plant, fungi and bacteria based biocontrol agents in addressing management of SDS.Keywords: Soybean sudden death syndrome, SDS, Fusarium virguliforme, biocontrol, global reports, yield losses due to SDS, epidemiological factors, greenhouse and field screening. ______________________________________________________________________________This is a manuscript of an article from CAB Reviews 11 (2016): 039, doi: 10.1079/PAVSNNR201611039. Navi, S. S.; Yang, X. B. 2016. Sudden death syndrome -a growing threat of losses in soybeans. CAB International, Wallingford, UK. Aoki et al., and F. virguliforme,90] is an economically significant soil-borne disease, and a risk to many soybean production areas worldwide. The disease was first observed by H.J. Walters in Arkansas, United States in 1971[100], but it was only in 1983 that the disease was named as sudden death syndrome (SDS) of unknown etiology [40]. As of this review, the disease has been reported in three continents, North America (Canada and United States), South America (Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Paraguay, and Uruguay), and Africa (South Africa), and within the United States 21 states (Fig. 1) Whether the pathogens causing SDS have been introduced in to new regions or if they have been present in the soil in production fields of these countries for some time without being detected is unknown. After the SDS was detected in Iowa [150], Scherm and Yang [114] developed a risk assessment model to determine potential geographic range of development of this disease, which was considered a southern disease by then, in North America. They predi...

show abstract

Usefulness of 10 genomic regions in soybean associated with sudden death syndrome resistance

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sudden death syndrome (SDS) is an important soybean [Glycine max (L) Merrill] disease caused by the soilborne fungus Fusarium virguliforme. Currently, 14 quantitative trait loci (QTL) had been confirmed associated with resistance or tolerance to SDS. The objective of the study was to evaluate usefulness of 10 of these QTL in controlling disease expression. Six populations were developed providing a total of 321 F2-derived lines for the study. Recombinant inbred lines (RIL) used as parents were obtained from populations of 'Essex' × 'Forrest' (EF), 'Flyer' × 'Hartwig' (FH), and 'Pyramid' × 'Douglas' (PD). Disease resistance was evaluated in the greenhouse at three different planting times, each with four replications, using sorghum infested with F. virguliforme homogeneously mixed in the soil (Luckew et al., Crop Sci 52:2215-2223, 2012). Four disease assessment criteria-foliar disease incidence (DI), foliar leaf scorch disease severity (DS), area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC), and root rot severity-were used. QTL were identified in more than one of the disease assessment criteria, mainly associated with lines in the most resistant categories. Five QTL (qRfs4, qRfs5, qRfs7, qRfs12, and Rfs16) were associated with at least one of the disease assessments across multiple populations. Of the five, qRfs4 was associated with DI, AUDPC, and root rot severity, and Rfs16 with AUDPC and root rot severity. The findings suggest it may be possible for plant breeders to focus on stacking a subset of the previously identified QTL to improve resistance to SDS in soybean.

show abstract

Identification of quantitative trait loci for resistance against soybean sudden death syndrome caused by Fusarium tucumaniae

Cited by 7 publications

References 23 publications

Breeding for disease resistance in soybean: a global perspective

Breeding for disease resistance in soybean: a global perspective

Sudden death syndrome - a growing threat of losses in soybeans.

Usefulness of 10 genomic regions in soybean associated with sudden death syndrome resistance

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About