2022
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwac118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of Putative Causal Relationships Between Type 2 Diabetes and Blood-Based Biomarkers in East Asians by Mendelian Randomization

Abstract: Observational studies revealed phenotypic associations between type 2 diabetes (T2D) and many biomarkers. However, causality between these conditions in East Asians is unclear. We leveraged genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics of T2D (Ncase = 77,418; Ncontrol = 356,122) from the Asian Genetic Epidemiology Network (sample recruited during 2001-2011), and the GWAS summary statistics of 42 biomarkers (N = 12,303 to 143,658) from BioBank Japan (sample recruited during 2003-2008) to investigate c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…( Supplementary Table 1 ) Association analyses were adjusted for gender and body mass index(BMI). These instruments have also been used in previous MR studies ( 25 , 26 ). Additionally,We also used this summary-level data for T2D in the reverse MR analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( Supplementary Table 1 ) Association analyses were adjusted for gender and body mass index(BMI). These instruments have also been used in previous MR studies ( 25 , 26 ). Additionally,We also used this summary-level data for T2D in the reverse MR analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The putative causal relationship between two traits was considered to be determined if consistent results were identified by more than four MR models with FDR < 0.05. Depending on the data type of the outcome and exposure trait, the MR estimates (i.e., β xy ) were converted to liability scale using one of the methods described by Byrne et al(29, 30). The related formulae of the methods were described in the Supplementary Material.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the data type of the outcome and exposure trait, the MR estimates (i.e., ߚ ௫௬ ) were converted to liability scale using one of the methods described by Byrne et al (29,30).…”
Section: Causal Relationship Inferencementioning
confidence: 99%