2001
DOI: 10.1002/1615-9861(200107)1:7<829::aid-prot829>3.3.co;2-i
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of protein carbonyls after two-dimensional electrophoresis

Abstract: The oxidative modification of proteins plays a major role in a number of human diseases, but identity of the specific proteins that are most susceptible to oxidation has posed a difficult problem. Protein carbonyls are increased after oxidative stress, and after derivatization with 2,4-dinitrophenyl hydrazine (DNP) they can be detected by various analytical and immunological methods. Although high resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis (2-DE) can resolve virtually all proteins present in a cell or tissue i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…300 μg of plasma proteins, measured by Bradford method, were then diluted with a buffer yielding final concentrations of 7 mol/L urea, 2 mol/L thiourea, 0.2% SDS, 4% CHAPS, 2% v/v carrier ampholytes pH 3–10, 20 mmol/L Tris, 55 mmol/L dithiothreitol, and bromophenol blue. IPG ready strips, 11 cm, pH 3–10 non linear gradient or 4–7 linear gradient (Biorad), were actively rehydrated at 50 V for 24 h. Samples were loaded at the cathode and focused for a total of 20 kV h. Following isoelectric focusing, the oxidized proteins were derivatized by the “in‐strip DNPH derivatization” method of Conrad et al [9]. Briefly, the IPG strips were incubated in 2 N HCl with 10 mmol/L DNPH, washed with 2 mol/L Tris/30% glycerol and equilibrated first with a solution containing 50 mmol/L Tris‐HCl, 6 mol/L urea, 30% v/v glycerol, 2% SDS and 2% dithiothreitol, and then with the same buffer containing 4.5% iodoacetamide instead of dithiothreitol.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…300 μg of plasma proteins, measured by Bradford method, were then diluted with a buffer yielding final concentrations of 7 mol/L urea, 2 mol/L thiourea, 0.2% SDS, 4% CHAPS, 2% v/v carrier ampholytes pH 3–10, 20 mmol/L Tris, 55 mmol/L dithiothreitol, and bromophenol blue. IPG ready strips, 11 cm, pH 3–10 non linear gradient or 4–7 linear gradient (Biorad), were actively rehydrated at 50 V for 24 h. Samples were loaded at the cathode and focused for a total of 20 kV h. Following isoelectric focusing, the oxidized proteins were derivatized by the “in‐strip DNPH derivatization” method of Conrad et al [9]. Briefly, the IPG strips were incubated in 2 N HCl with 10 mmol/L DNPH, washed with 2 mol/L Tris/30% glycerol and equilibrated first with a solution containing 50 mmol/L Tris‐HCl, 6 mol/L urea, 30% v/v glycerol, 2% SDS and 2% dithiothreitol, and then with the same buffer containing 4.5% iodoacetamide instead of dithiothreitol.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before immunodetection, the membranes were stained in 0.2% w/v Ponceau S in 3% w/v trichloroacetic acid and the spot position marked in order to facilitate computer‐assisted matching on the colloidal blue stained gel. Immunodetection was performed as previously described [9], using biotinylated anti‐DNP antibody (Molecular Probes). The immunoreactive spots were detected using avidin horseradish peroxidase‐conjugated (Biorad) and a chemiluminescence detection system (Amersham).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general methods for 2D protein analysis and Western blotting are adapted from Ausubel et al [25] with modifications for immunodetection of protein carbonyl groups according to [20,26]. For 2D analysis either 40 μg (for protein detection) or 100 μg (for Western blotting) of protein was mixed with re‐hydration solution (8 M urea, 0.4% dithiothreitol (DTT), 4% CHAPS and 1% immobilized pH gradient (IPG) buffer, pH 3–10) and loaded on to 18 cm IPG strips (non‐linear pH gradient 3–10; Amersham Pharmacia).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The membranes were incubated in phosphate‐buffered saline–Tween containing 5% (w/v) skimmed milk powder, and were probed with rabbit anti‐DNP as primary antibody (Molecular Probes Inc; 1:16 000 dilution) and peroxidase‐linked goat‐anti rabbit IgG as secondary antibody (Sigma; 1:16 000 dilution). Carbonylated proteins were immunodetected with a chemiluminescent peroxidase substrate, West femtoM (Pierce) [26] and visualized using a Fuji LAS1000 image analyzer with pre‐cooled camera. Chemiluminescence was quantified using Fuji image gauge software.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…England, Driscoll, and Cotter (2006) analyzed the redox proteomics of HL‐60 leukemia cells treated with doxorubicin, etoposide, and mitoxantrone. The strategy involved separation of a whole‐cell proteome by isoelectric focusing, after which the gel strip was stained with DNPH before the second dimension SDS–PAGE (Conrad et al, 2001). This strategy minimized problems associated with DNPH‐induced alterations of the isoelectric point of proteins and DNPH‐derived contaminants.…”
Section: The Role Of Ms To Identify Molecular Targets Of Natural Prodmentioning
confidence: 99%