2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10531-004-6682-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of Prosopis juliflora and Prosopis pallida Accessions Using Molecular Markers

Abstract: There has been much taxonomic confusion over the identification of Prosopis species, especially where introduced. Prosopis juliflora is the most widespread species in the arid and semi-arid tropics, although it has been confused with other species, particularly the closely related Prosopis pallida. In this study, RAPDs markers were used for the first time to distinguish between these species. Eighteen primers were used in amplification reactions, which yielded an average of 120 bands per accession. A dendrogra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent works on ploidy by Harris et al (2003) and Trenchard et al (2008) showed that the two species can be distinguished on the basis of their morphology and ploidy. RAPD markers also were useful in differentiating the two species (Landeras et al 2006). However, results obtained suggest that P. juliflora is closer to the four North American species identified in this study than to P. pallida.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Recent works on ploidy by Harris et al (2003) and Trenchard et al (2008) showed that the two species can be distinguished on the basis of their morphology and ploidy. RAPD markers also were useful in differentiating the two species (Landeras et al 2006). However, results obtained suggest that P. juliflora is closer to the four North American species identified in this study than to P. pallida.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…The two species are similar in leaf morphology and tree form, and Pasiecznik et al (2001) assumed that naturally occurring hybridization in their overlapping native ranges led to the difficulty in differentiating the two species. Molecular studies were useful in differentiating the two species and reported them to be closely related (Landeras et al 2006), and this and another study (Harris et al 2003) confirmed that P. juliflora was the only known naturally occurring tetraploid species in the genus, though the origin of P. juliflora remained unresolved. Further molecular analysis was noted to be essential in order to fully exploit these species especially in the areas where they are introduced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 3 more Smart Citations