2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0960-894x(02)00160-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of potent and selective oxytocin antagonists. Part 2: further investigation of benzofuran derivatives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In another study, the hOTR model was built with the bRho template [21]. In order to obtain relevant structure-activity relationships, we have now carried out QSAR calculations on the receptor-based alignment of 58 BZX hOTR antagonists (Tables 1 and 2, [22,23], compounds are provided in Supplementary Information in SMILES format), with the aims: (1) docking 57 non-peptide OT antagonists to the putative active site of the hOTR, determined earlier [20]; (2) characterization of the 58 receptor-ligand Table 1 Structures and measured pK i values of the OT antagonists (training set) ID R pK i imposed with the most active ligand, and docking calculations were performed to obtain the receptor-based alignment. The docking procedures were carried out with the AutoDock 3.05 Software [24] with the following parameters: the grid box (40 Â 40 Â 60 grid point, 0.375 Å grid point distance) was centred on the ligand; in the calculation of the electrostatic grid map, the distance-dependent dielectric constant of Mehler and Solmayer [25] was applied, for the van der Waals interaction the 12-6, and for the H-bond the 12-10 Lennard-Jones potential was utilized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another study, the hOTR model was built with the bRho template [21]. In order to obtain relevant structure-activity relationships, we have now carried out QSAR calculations on the receptor-based alignment of 58 BZX hOTR antagonists (Tables 1 and 2, [22,23], compounds are provided in Supplementary Information in SMILES format), with the aims: (1) docking 57 non-peptide OT antagonists to the putative active site of the hOTR, determined earlier [20]; (2) characterization of the 58 receptor-ligand Table 1 Structures and measured pK i values of the OT antagonists (training set) ID R pK i imposed with the most active ligand, and docking calculations were performed to obtain the receptor-based alignment. The docking procedures were carried out with the AutoDock 3.05 Software [24] with the following parameters: the grid box (40 Â 40 Â 60 grid point, 0.375 Å grid point distance) was centred on the ligand; in the calculation of the electrostatic grid map, the distance-dependent dielectric constant of Mehler and Solmayer [25] was applied, for the van der Waals interaction the 12-6, and for the H-bond the 12-10 Lennard-Jones potential was utilized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6). PK/PD comparisons of 40 with other OT antagonists: atosiban, our previous OT antagonist template 28 and Merck L-371257, in the rat uterine contractility model (Fig. 6) using the same OT challenge of 0.3 mg mL À1 throughout showed that 40 has the best efficacy in this species.…”
Section: In Vivo Potencymentioning
confidence: 91%
“…However, although the 4 0 -F and 4 0 -NMe 2 derivatives had the best pharmacokinetic profile of these highly potent mono-4 0 -substituted phenyldiketopiperazines, they still had rather low bioavailability in the rat. 24 The question of how to improve the bioavailability of this template was addressed by analogy with a previous benzoxazine class of OT antagonists 28 where an aromatic fluoro substituent ) at 0.6 mgkg À1 5% DMSO/95% PEG400 formulation.…”
Section: Pharmacokinetics and Property-based Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various structural modifications of this compound have been prepared in order to increase the affinity toward human OTRs [5][6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present work we have made an attempt to identify the key elements of the receptor-ligand interaction for 45 nonpeptide OTR BZX analogs taken from the literature [8,9] (Tables 1a-f). The problem was addressed by using molecular docking incorporating receptor flexibility with constrained simulated annealing (CSA) in order to generate binding hypotheses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%