2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1135(00)00212-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of porcine intestinal spirochetes by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of ribosomal DNA encoding 23S rRNA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This pathogen and B. pilosicoli, B. innocens/B. intermedia were also detected and differentiated utilising generic Brachyspira primers and subsequent restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis of TaqI digested amplicons (Barcellos et al, 2000). PCR product of the Brachyspira sp.…”
Section: Sample Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This pathogen and B. pilosicoli, B. innocens/B. intermedia were also detected and differentiated utilising generic Brachyspira primers and subsequent restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis of TaqI digested amplicons (Barcellos et al, 2000). PCR product of the Brachyspira sp.…”
Section: Sample Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, hemolysis patterns on blood agar, during primary isolation, have been used for general identification to distinguish pathogenic from non-pathogenic intestinal spirochetes [6]. However, there are some strains, which produce weak and/or intermediate hemolysis and can not be assigned to a specific group [3]. PCR-RFLP has been shown to produce accurate, rapid and reproducible results for the identification of porcine intestinal spirochetes [3,16,19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are some strains, which produce weak and/or intermediate hemolysis and can not be assigned to a specific group [3]. PCR-RFLP has been shown to produce accurate, rapid and reproducible results for the identification of porcine intestinal spirochetes [3,16,19]. For nox -based PCR-RFLP experiment [16], four sets of primers were used; this implies that the target sequences for primer binding are not highly conserved, though the restriction pattern was highly distinct.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…But there are few reports on diagnostic techniques for the detection of antibodies to B. pilosicoli or B. alvinipulli in infected animals. Although polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with 16S rDNA [12] or 23S rRNA [2] is a useful tool for the identification of B. pilosicoli, it cannot detect less than 10 3 spirochete cells in the fecal samples [8]. On the other hand, PCR tests and immunological tests have never been developed for the diagnosis of B. alvinipulli [15].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%