2007
DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2007.0325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of oral bacterial species associated with halitosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
109
2
15

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
6
109
2
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies evaluating oral bacterial production of H 2 S or VSCs reported that Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Treponema denticola, Solobacterium moorei, and Veillonella alcalescens were correlated with oral malodor (Stassinakis et al, 2002;Kazor et al, 2003;Tyrrell et al, 2003;Tanaka et al, 2004;Washio et al, 2005;Haraszthy et al, 2007;Takeshita et al, 2010). However, the findings were mostly based on tracking a few specific bacteria (Tanaka et al, 2004) or were dependent on bacterial culture (Tyrrell et al, 2003;Haraszthy et al, 2007). In addition, those studies that adopted non-culture-based methods used Sanger sequencing of a small number of 16S rRNA gene clones (Kazor et al, 2003;Washio et al, 2005;Haraszthy et al, 2007) or T-RFLP (Takeshita et al, 2010), which provided limited resolution of the complex oral microbiota.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Previous studies evaluating oral bacterial production of H 2 S or VSCs reported that Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Treponema denticola, Solobacterium moorei, and Veillonella alcalescens were correlated with oral malodor (Stassinakis et al, 2002;Kazor et al, 2003;Tyrrell et al, 2003;Tanaka et al, 2004;Washio et al, 2005;Haraszthy et al, 2007;Takeshita et al, 2010). However, the findings were mostly based on tracking a few specific bacteria (Tanaka et al, 2004) or were dependent on bacterial culture (Tyrrell et al, 2003;Haraszthy et al, 2007). In addition, those studies that adopted non-culture-based methods used Sanger sequencing of a small number of 16S rRNA gene clones (Kazor et al, 2003;Washio et al, 2005;Haraszthy et al, 2007) or T-RFLP (Takeshita et al, 2010), which provided limited resolution of the complex oral microbiota.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both links and distinctions were identified between these bacterial taxa and those oral-malodor-associated bacteria from other studies. Previous studies evaluating oral bacterial production of H 2 S or VSCs reported that Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Treponema denticola, Solobacterium moorei, and Veillonella alcalescens were correlated with oral malodor (Stassinakis et al, 2002;Kazor et al, 2003;Tyrrell et al, 2003;Tanaka et al, 2004;Washio et al, 2005;Haraszthy et al, 2007;Takeshita et al, 2010). However, the findings were mostly based on tracking a few specific bacteria (Tanaka et al, 2004) or were dependent on bacterial culture (Tyrrell et al, 2003;Haraszthy et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…El Solobacterium moorei es un microorganismo que coloniza principalmente el dorso de la lengua y su prevalencia es muy alta en casos de halitosis, por el contrario es poco frecuente en individuos sin halitosis. Adicionalmente existen otros microorganismos relacionados con la halitosis (38). Los patógenos periodontales en la bolsa periodontal encuentran un ambiente ideal para la producción de CVS.…”
Section: Nichos Y Ambientes Anaeróbicos Especialesunclassified
“…Recently, a molecular approach based on 16S rRNA was been applied to investigate the diversity of both cultivable and uncultivable species in the human oral cavity [37][38][39]. Several investigators have attempted to identify the oral bacterial species associated with halitosis by PCR amplification of tongue-debris samples, and cloning and sequencing of 16S rRNA genes [40][41][42]. Although the size of the study populations was limited (11, 13, and 32, respectively) and their oral condition was not described, the data showed some similarities.…”
Section: Malodor-associated Microbiotamentioning
confidence: 99%