2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.03.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of obstetric targets for reducing cesarean section rate using the Robson Ten Group Classification in a tertiary level hospital

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

15
55
5
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
15
55
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2 The size of group 5 is usually related to the overall cesarean rate, and if this group is large or over 15%, it could mean that the cesarean rate is high in that particular setting. [2][3][4][5][6]13,15,17 The cesarean rate in this group was noticeably lower in our study at 55.5%. 2,4 Our study also indicated that Robson groups 2b and 4b, planned cesarean at term, were relatively small at 0.3% and 0.7%.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 The size of group 5 is usually related to the overall cesarean rate, and if this group is large or over 15%, it could mean that the cesarean rate is high in that particular setting. [2][3][4][5][6]13,15,17 The cesarean rate in this group was noticeably lower in our study at 55.5%. 2,4 Our study also indicated that Robson groups 2b and 4b, planned cesarean at term, were relatively small at 0.3% and 0.7%.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…[2][3][4][5][6] However, two studies from developed countries with low rates-The Netherlands 7 and the Nordic countries 8 -indicate that the largest contributing groups to the cesarean rate are nulliparous women followed by women with a previous cesarean. Findings from countries with high rates-Australia, Singapore, Brazil, and Italy-indicate that women with a previous cesarean contributed the most to the cesarean rate followed by women who underwent an induction or an elective cesarean at term.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding conforms with the literature, as being nulliparous was identified as a contributor to the likelihood of a cesarean section [10,11] . In the present study, we established that women older than 35 years were more likely to have a cesarean section, which corresponds to results from recent research.…”
Section: Parity and Agesupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Thus considering only obstetric history, women who have previously had a caesarean section are an increasingly important determinant of overall caesarean section rate as observed in the literature. 10,14 Caesarean indications in these patients in group 1 are usually dominated by the acute fetal distress, fetal-pelvic disproportion and the relevance of such indications is based on a number of means of monitoring and diagnosis that we do not always have in our hospitals. So a caesarean indication in nulliparous must be discussed, discussed again in order to make it relevant and absolute that can help save the maximum number of first Caesarean section.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,5,6 Our rate is also higher than the average rate in France (15.5-20.8%), in Canadian (26,9%), however, our rate of the second period (41.7%) is comparable to those of public hospitals in Italy (43.7%) and Greek (41.6%). [7][8][9][10][11] But one thing is clear, there is a considerable increase in the CS rate as well in developing countries than in developed countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%