2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10295-015-1584-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of novel genes responsible for salt tolerance by transposon mutagenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Abstract: Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains tolerant to salt stress are important for the production of single-cell protein using kimchi waste brine. In this study, two strains (TN-1 and TN-2) tolerant of up to 10 % (w/v) NaCl were isolated by screening a transposon-mediated mutant library. The determination of transposon insertion sites and Northern blot analysis identified two genes, MDJ1 and VPS74, and revealed disruptions of the open reading frame of both genes, indicating that salt tolerance can be conferred. Such t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also note that neither haploids or diploids were put through a sexual cycle; allowing for sexual reproduction speeds the rate of adaptation ( McDonald, Rice & Desai, 2016 ). We also find greater fitness increase in complete medium (CM) plus NaCl stress than in CM alone, which was not surprising given what is known about adaptation to NaCl stress in S. cerevisiae ( Blomberg, 1995 ; Dhar et al, 2011 ; Kun, Yang & Kim, 2015 ; Tekarslan-Sahin, Alkim & Sezgin, 2018 ). In contrast, we were surprised to detect less fitness increase in CM plus EtOH stress than in CM alone.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…We also note that neither haploids or diploids were put through a sexual cycle; allowing for sexual reproduction speeds the rate of adaptation ( McDonald, Rice & Desai, 2016 ). We also find greater fitness increase in complete medium (CM) plus NaCl stress than in CM alone, which was not surprising given what is known about adaptation to NaCl stress in S. cerevisiae ( Blomberg, 1995 ; Dhar et al, 2011 ; Kun, Yang & Kim, 2015 ; Tekarslan-Sahin, Alkim & Sezgin, 2018 ). In contrast, we were surprised to detect less fitness increase in CM plus EtOH stress than in CM alone.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Subsequently, 26S rRNA D1/D2 region of each isolate was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) using NL-1 and NL-4 as forward and reverse primers, respectively. The PCR was performed in a final volume of 25 µL containing 1.5 µL of extracted DNA, 10 µmol/ L of each primer, 0.5 µL of Taq DNA polymerase (2.5 U/µL), 2.5 µL of 10×Taq buffer, 2.0 µL of Mg (13). PCR products (2 µL) were further analyzed on 10 g/L agarose gel containing 0.7 µg/L of EB.…”
Section: T Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the regulatory mechanism of how salt-tolerant probiotics survive under salt stress and produce functional metabolites is still unclear. Typical salt-intolerant probiotics, including Lactobacillus, Saccharomyces cerevisiae , and Bifidobacterium , cannot grow when the salt concentration is increased by more than 8% NaCl ( Palomino et al, 2010 ; Park et al, 2015 ; Piqué et al, 2019 ). However, salt-tolerant probiotics have shown great potential for development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%