2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00468-012-0803-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of new S-RNase self-incompatibility alleles and characterization of natural mutations in Iranian almond cultivars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A table of almond cross-incompatibility was constructed using the results of the present work and the plentiful data reported by other authors (Ortega et al, 2006;López et al, 2006;Barckley et al, 2006;Kodad et al, 2008;Valizadeh et al, 2009;Kodad and Socias i Company, 2009;Halász et al, 2010;Kodad et al, 2010;Fernández i Martí et al, 2010;Martínez-García et al, 2011;Mousavi et al, 2011;Hafizi et al, 2013;Curró et al, 2015). This new table was not intended to be merely an update of the earlier ones, but a compilation or review table in which all the self-incompatible almond cultivars S-genotyped to date were to be included, and thus it was made after an accurate correction of the inconsistencies detected in previous works.…”
Section: Revision and Updating Of Almond Cross-incompatibility Groupsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A table of almond cross-incompatibility was constructed using the results of the present work and the plentiful data reported by other authors (Ortega et al, 2006;López et al, 2006;Barckley et al, 2006;Kodad et al, 2008;Valizadeh et al, 2009;Kodad and Socias i Company, 2009;Halász et al, 2010;Kodad et al, 2010;Fernández i Martí et al, 2010;Martínez-García et al, 2011;Mousavi et al, 2011;Hafizi et al, 2013;Curró et al, 2015). This new table was not intended to be merely an update of the earlier ones, but a compilation or review table in which all the self-incompatible almond cultivars S-genotyped to date were to be included, and thus it was made after an accurate correction of the inconsistencies detected in previous works.…”
Section: Revision and Updating Of Almond Cross-incompatibility Groupsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Other primers have also been used to assess the Sgenotype in almond (Channuntapipat et al, 2003;López et al, 2006;Barckley et al, 2006;Halász et al, 2008;Kodad et al, 2008;Kodad et al, 2010;Curró et al, 2015). The information obtained with the different methods and primer sets indicated has been included in different versions of a table of almond cross-incompatibility groups (Kester et al, 1994;Bošković et al, 2003;Barckley et al, 2006;Ortega et al, 2006;Kodadand Socias i Company, 2009;Hafizi et al, 2013). However, to date no attempt has been made to reconcile the information of all these tables neither to correct possible inconsistencies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One exact way to determine S-genotype of pear cultivars is by identification of self-incompatibility alleles using allele-specific PCR amplification. This method is already used for identification of S-genotypes in almond (Ortega et al 2006;Valizadeh and Ershadi 2009;Hafizi et al 2013;Mousavi et al 2014), apple Janssens et al 1995;Ershadi et al 2006), apricot (Vilanova et al 2006;Murathan et al 2017), sweet cherry (Szikriszt et al 2013), Japanese pear (Ishimizu et al 1999;Takasaki et al 2004;Kim et al 2007) and European pear (Moriya et al 2007;Mota et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Prunus, including almond, SI is gametophytic and under the genetic control of complex and highly variable S loci. Based on the results of experimental crosses, there are thought to be at least 50 variants at the almond S-locus [1][2][3][4][5] . Sequencing of a 71,953 bp region of one haplotype (S 7 , also known as S c ) showed that the almond S locus includes S-locus F-box (SLF), stylar RNase (S-RNase) and S-haplotype-specific F-box (SFB) genes, other open reading frames and pairs of long-terminal-repeat retrotransposons (LTRs) 6 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this complex locus, variant forms of individual genes are referred to as alleles, while variant forms of the entire locus are referred to as haplotypes. Although the S 7 haplotype is the only one for which a nearly complete sequence has been published, the SLF, S-RNase and/or SFB alleles of some other haplotypes have been fully or partially sequenced [1][2][3][4][5] . Among haplotypes that have been physically mapped, the order and orientations of S-locus features are conserved, but the distances between these features vary 6 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%