2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2019.111936
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of new potent A1 adenosine receptor antagonists using a multistage virtual screening approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…237 Through VS of 3.1 million molecules against M2 and M3, Kruse et al identified a partial M3 agonist without measurable M2 agonism, capable of stimulating insulin release from a mouse β-cell line. 238 Wei et al reported a multistage VS of the ChemDiv library (1,492,362 compounds) toward A 1 AR and discovered four novel antagonists with good affinity and selectively (>100-fold) over A 2A R. 239 Virtual screening of ultralarge libraries [224][225][226] Novel scaffolds and chemotypes, higher chances of finding potent ligands…”
Section: Subtype Selectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…237 Through VS of 3.1 million molecules against M2 and M3, Kruse et al identified a partial M3 agonist without measurable M2 agonism, capable of stimulating insulin release from a mouse β-cell line. 238 Wei et al reported a multistage VS of the ChemDiv library (1,492,362 compounds) toward A 1 AR and discovered four novel antagonists with good affinity and selectively (>100-fold) over A 2A R. 239 Virtual screening of ultralarge libraries [224][225][226] Novel scaffolds and chemotypes, higher chances of finding potent ligands…”
Section: Subtype Selectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our previous study showed that a multistage approach sequentially integrating machine learning classification models and pharmacophore and molecular docking methods is efficient in identifying bioactive compounds from chemical databases [52]. In this study, the performance of the hierarchical multistage virtual screening approach was evaluated through a validation set containing 433 bioactive dual A 1 /A 2A AR antagonists (40 nM < K i <600 nM) and 11605 decoys (S2 Table).…”
Section: Virtual Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, 19 tested compounds were purchased from J&K Scientific Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Functional assays were performed by Pharmaron (Beijing) as previously described [52] by evaluating AR-mediated cAMP production using CHO-A 1 cells and HEK293-A 2A cells stably expressing A 1 AR or A 2A AR, respectively. The CHO-A 1 cells and HEK293-A 2A cells were cultured in growth medium (Ham's F12K (A 1 AR)/DMEM (A 2A AR) + 10% FBS + 1 � Ps + 400 μg/ml G418) at 37˚C and 5% CO 2 , collected by centrifugation and resuspended in Hank's balanced salt solution (HBSS), 0.1% bovine serum albumin (BSA), 20 mM N-(2-hydroxyethyl)-piperazine-N0-ethanesulfonic acid (HEPES) and 100 nM 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX).…”
Section: Functional Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning models could be beneficial for lead optimization and chemical compound prioritization when using computer-aided drug design ( Lavecchia, 2015 ). Statistical learning algorithms, namely, Naïve Bayesian ( Murakami and Mizuguchi, 2010 ; Fang et al, 2013 ) random forests (RFs) ( Jayaraj et al, 2016 ; Wei et al, 2016 ; Li et al, 2019a ; Wei et al, 2020 ), support vector machines (SVMs) ( Han et al, 2008 ; Mahé and Vert, 2009 ; Fang et al, 2013 ; Jayaraj and Jain, 2019 ; Wei et al, 2019 ), decision stump ( Nand et al, 2020 ), artificial neural networks (ANNs) ( Lobanov, 2004 ; Li et al, 2019b ), and k nearest neighbors (kNNs) ( Mahé and Vert, 2009 ), have been used to build models and effectively employed in virtual screening, prediction of protein–protein interactions, ADMET prediction, and pharmacokinetic studies with substantial outputs. Kadioglu and co-workers applied a workflow of combined virtual drug screening, molecular docking, and supervised machine learning algorithms to identify novel drug candidates against COVID-19 ( Kadioglu et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%