2011
DOI: 10.1593/neo.111102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of MET and SRC Activation in Melanoma Cell Lines Showing Primary Resistance to PLX4032

Abstract: PLX4032/vemurafenib is a first-in-class small-molecule BRAF(V600E) inhibitor with clinical activity in patients with BRAF mutant melanoma. Nevertheless, drug resistance develops in treated patients, and strategies to overcome primary and acquired resistance are required. To explore the molecular mechanisms involved in primary resistance to PLX4032, we investigated its effects on cell proliferation and signaling in a panel of 27 genetically characterized patient-derived melanoma cell lines. Cell sensitivity to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
94
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
94
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several mechanisms of acquired resistance to vemurafenib have been identified and these include secondary NRAS mutations (10), mutations in ARAF and CRAF (11), amplification of BRAF (12), activation of other prosurvival signaling pathways, including the phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K) pathway (11), and amplification of upstream receptor tyrosine kinases such as MET (13). To date, over a dozen acquired mechanisms of resistance are described and, often, multiple mechanisms of resistance are identified in the same patient (12,14,15).…”
Section: Brafmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several mechanisms of acquired resistance to vemurafenib have been identified and these include secondary NRAS mutations (10), mutations in ARAF and CRAF (11), amplification of BRAF (12), activation of other prosurvival signaling pathways, including the phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K) pathway (11), and amplification of upstream receptor tyrosine kinases such as MET (13). To date, over a dozen acquired mechanisms of resistance are described and, often, multiple mechanisms of resistance are identified in the same patient (12,14,15).…”
Section: Brafmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emerging evidence from both preclinical studies and analysis of pre-and on-treatment biopsies from patients treated with BRAFi suggest that PTEN loss, elevated pretreatment levels of CRAF, CCND1 amplification (with consequent cyclin D1 overexpression), CDK4-activating mutations, the receptor tyrosine kinase CMET expression and tumor microenvironment hepatocyte growth factor expression (the ligand for CMET) are promising predictive biomarkers that identify relative resistance to BRAF inhibitors and are worthy of validation. 63,[70][71][72][73] Cyclin D and CDK4 alterations, PTEN loss, and hepatocyte growth factor expression all represent potential therapeutic opportunites given the emergence of selective CDK4/6 inhibitors (targeting Cyclin D and CDK4 alterations), PI3K inhibitors (PTEN loss), and anti-hepatocyte growth factor antibodies and/or CMET inhibitors (hepatocyte growth factor expression) that could be plausibly combined with BRAF inhibitors.…”
Section: Mek Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the abovedescribed mutations have all been identified previously in melanoma [32,33]. Moreover, MET amplification occurs in melanoma tissues [34]; in melanoma cells, MET activation by amplification led to primary resistance to vemurafenib treatment [35]. In addition, it has been shown that hepatocyte growth factor, the only known natural ligand for MET, can cause resistance to RAF inhibitors [36,37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%