2005
DOI: 10.1080/09585190500220796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of management development needs: a comparison across companies of different ownership – foreign, joint venture and local in Sri Lanka

Abstract: To cite this article: Vathsala M. Akuratiyagamage (2005) Identification of management development needs: a comparison across companies of different ownership -foreign, joint venture and local in Abstract This paper presents the results of an empirical investigation of seventy-eight human resource managers employed in seventy-eight wholly foreign-owned, foreign and local joint venture and wholly local-owned export-oriented clothing manufacturing companies in Sri Lanka. The study investigated human resource mana… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with the traditional purpose of PM where the primary goal has often been summarized as motivating and developing employees and teams to achieve organizational goals (Aguinis, 2013;Latham & Wexley, 1994;Rynes et al, 2005). In our review, topics in this theme included the use of formal feedback for employee development and training, identifying employee strengths and weaknesses, and coaching employees to improve performance-both at the individual and organizational level (Akuratiyagamage, 2005;Peretz & Fried, 2012). Particularly prevalent were papers examining employee reaction toward developmental aspects of PM using quantitative survey data (Krats & Brown, 2013;Selvarajan & Cloninger, 2012).…”
Section: Evaluating and Reviewing Performancesupporting
confidence: 69%
“…This is consistent with the traditional purpose of PM where the primary goal has often been summarized as motivating and developing employees and teams to achieve organizational goals (Aguinis, 2013;Latham & Wexley, 1994;Rynes et al, 2005). In our review, topics in this theme included the use of formal feedback for employee development and training, identifying employee strengths and weaknesses, and coaching employees to improve performance-both at the individual and organizational level (Akuratiyagamage, 2005;Peretz & Fried, 2012). Particularly prevalent were papers examining employee reaction toward developmental aspects of PM using quantitative survey data (Krats & Brown, 2013;Selvarajan & Cloninger, 2012).…”
Section: Evaluating and Reviewing Performancesupporting
confidence: 69%
“…This is very encouraging from the point of view of the strategic and normative role of HR practitioners in Africa in general and Malawi in particular. The study corroborates the findings of similar studies of HR roles in developing and transitional countries (Akuratiyagamage, 2005;Antila, 2006;Antila and Kakkonen, 2008;Bowen et al, 2002;Mamman and Somantri, 2014;Mamman and Al Kulaiby, 2014;Zuzeviciute and Margarita, 2010). Therefore, the study has contributed to the existing literature.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…• Feedback richness (Selvarajan & Cloninger, 2012) • Feedback helpfulness (Kuvaas, (Silva & Tosi, 2004) • Locally versus foreign owned (Akuratiyagamage, 2005) • Organizational size (Giumetti, Schroeder, & Switzer, 2015) • Unionized setting (Brown & Warren, 2011)…”
Section: Ratee Participationmentioning
confidence: 99%