2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.aiia.2019.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of maize (Zea mays L.) progeny genotypes based on two probabilistic approaches: Logistic regression and naïve Bayes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The seeds were planted in the Spring 2017, in a completely randomized factorial experiment at the experimental station of University Nangui Abrogoua, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire. Planting density and agricultural practices were done as described previously (Seka et al, 2019). Plots were tagged with identification number that identified each parent and its progeny.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The seeds were planted in the Spring 2017, in a completely randomized factorial experiment at the experimental station of University Nangui Abrogoua, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire. Planting density and agricultural practices were done as described previously (Seka et al, 2019). Plots were tagged with identification number that identified each parent and its progeny.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gonzalez et al (2019) developed R-CNN model for the quantification of blueberries via several CNN architectures with the best classification rate of 0.726. Another successful application of an AI application was for the identification of progeny genotypes in maize as reported by Seka et al (2019). The maize samples were tested using Gaussian Naïve Bayes and Logistic Regression with an overall prediction accuracy ranging from 78 to 87%.…”
Section: Applications Of Ai In Quality Determination Of Food and Agricultural Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variabels in this research consisted of educational background (ED), employment (EM) as independent variables and digital mobile scanner usage (DMS) as dependent variables [15]. About 340 respondents accross several big cities in Indonesia from various backgrounds participated in this research but reduced to 310 due to lack of completed informations [16]. The employment status that has been collected came from numerous background so we divided it into only 5 categories, i.e: unemployment, student, employee, self employeed, and entrepreneur.…”
Section: Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%