2019
DOI: 10.1080/21691401.2019.1647225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of lncRNA biomarkers in lung squamous cell carcinoma using comprehensive analysis of lncRNA mediated ceRNA network

Abstract: 2019) Identification of lncRNA biomarkers in lung squamous cell carcinoma using comprehensive analysis of lncRNA mediated ceRNA network, Artificial Cells, Nanomedicine, and Biotechnology, 47:1, 3246-3258, ABSTRACTLong non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) act as a member of competing endogenous RNAs (ceRNAs) and plays a significant role in tumorigenesis. The aim of this study was to identify potential lncRNA biomarkers for predicting the prognosis of lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) using a comprehensive analysis of ln… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(52 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Current prognostic biomarkers for LUSC included prognostic alternative mRNA splicing signature, lncRNA signatures, and microRNA signatures [9,[11][12][13]. However, these studies [9,[11][12][13] only included LUSC data from the TCGA database. In this study, we built IRGPI based on 13 immune-related gene pairs from the training cohort and explored the prognostic value of IRGPI in the testing and validation cohorts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Current prognostic biomarkers for LUSC included prognostic alternative mRNA splicing signature, lncRNA signatures, and microRNA signatures [9,[11][12][13]. However, these studies [9,[11][12][13] only included LUSC data from the TCGA database. In this study, we built IRGPI based on 13 immune-related gene pairs from the training cohort and explored the prognostic value of IRGPI in the testing and validation cohorts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We summarized current biomarkers for LUSC and compared the biomarkers in Table 4. Li et al constructed a model with 6 lncRNAs from the TCGA LUSC cohort and the area under the curve (AUC) of the 6-lncRNA signature associated with 3-year survival was 0.672 in the training cohort [11]. Hu et al constructed a 3-lncRNA signature for LUSC and the AUC of this model associated with 3-year survival was 0.629 in the training cohort [12].…”
Section: Comparison Of Biomarkers For Luscmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We summarized current biomarkers for LUSC and compared the biomarkers in Table 3. Li et al constructed a model with 6 lncRNAs from TCGA LUSC cohort and the area under the curve (AUC) of the 6-lncRNA signature associated with 3-year survival was 0.672 in the training cohort [11]. Hu et al…”
Section: Comparison Of Biomarkers For Luscmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies associated with prognosis of LUSC patients mainly concentrated on the alternative mRNA splicing signatures, lncRNA signatures, and other transcriptome signatures [8][9][10][11][12][13]. As the component of the tumor microenvironment, tumor-in ltrating lymphocytes (TIL) revealed promising value for providing prognostic biomarkers [14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%