“…This may result in a wrong estimation of the process model with non-parametric closedloop identification methods, if the closed-loop system is not excited by some persistent excitations as references (set points) [11,21,25,32,33]. Thus one of the most popular closedloop identification approaches is to build a parametric model in the prediction error framework introduced by Söderstrom, Ljung and Gustavsson, [7,12,20,21] in the 1970s. It has recently been shown that the identifiability of a closed-loop prediction error method is possible even if the experiment is deemed not to be informative enough [4,6] (more details can be seen in [23,24,34]).…”