1974
DOI: 10.1109/tac.1974.1100702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of linear, multivariable systems operating under linear feedback control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
43
0
1

Year Published

1977
1977
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the 1970s, Söderstrom and Ljung, etc. initially extended the prediction error method (PEM) to the identification of multivariable systems in [8], gave system identifiability conditions in [10] and discussed accuracy aspects in [3]. In their works, closedloop identification methods were classified into three approaches, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the 1970s, Söderstrom and Ljung, etc. initially extended the prediction error method (PEM) to the identification of multivariable systems in [8], gave system identifiability conditions in [10] and discussed accuracy aspects in [3]. In their works, closedloop identification methods were classified into three approaches, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2.7)) of the system component inside the complex system, or (ii) system identifiability problem-the problem of determining any member of the set (c., Uj) e CCj x HiK·(~} of parameters indistinguishable from ajQ inside the complex system (for terminology, see Ljung et al 1974, Ljung 1976, 1978or Gustavsson et al 1977.…”
Section: Identifiability Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, owing to the terminology originated by Ljung et al 1974 (see also references above), the subsystem (2.1) will be said to be parameter (respectively, system) identifiable inside the complex system, if the parameter (respectively, system) identifiability problem can be solved satisfactorily for this subsystem. If, in turn, the parameter (system) identifiability problem can be solved for all subsystems jointly, the composite system will be called parameter (system) identifiable.…”
Section: Identifiability Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may result in a wrong estimation of the process model with non-parametric closedloop identification methods, if the closed-loop system is not excited by some persistent excitations as references (set points) [11,21,25,32,33]. Thus one of the most popular closedloop identification approaches is to build a parametric model in the prediction error framework introduced by Söderstrom, Ljung and Gustavsson, [7,12,20,21] in the 1970s. It has recently been shown that the identifiability of a closed-loop prediction error method is possible even if the experiment is deemed not to be informative enough [4,6] (more details can be seen in [23,24,34]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%