2022
DOI: 10.1155/2022/4748796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of Key Pathways and Establishment of a Seven-Gene Prognostic Signature in Cervical Cancer

Abstract: Cervical cancer (CC) remains high morbidity and mortality. We aimed to identify critical pathways underlying cervical carcinogenesis and establish a prognostic signature. Six datasets from the gene expression omnibus (GEO) database were used to screen the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between CC and normal tissues. We used the unions of the DEGs to perform functional analysis. The 108 overlapped DEGs were analyzed to determine a prognostic signature by Cox regression and Lasso analysis based on The Can… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As results showed in Supplementary Figure 4 , our eight gene signature performed better than the other then signature in 1, 3, 5 years OS prediction. but in ten year OS prediction, our signature showed less efficient than a seven gene signature (PLOD2, DSG2, SPP1, CXCL8, MCM5, HLTF, and KLF4) ( 32 ) and a six-gene signature (APOC1, GLTP, ISG20, SPP1, SLC24A3 and UPP1) ( 24 ). These results reveals that our signature may lead to a better treatment decisions comparison with other published prognostic signatures…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As results showed in Supplementary Figure 4 , our eight gene signature performed better than the other then signature in 1, 3, 5 years OS prediction. but in ten year OS prediction, our signature showed less efficient than a seven gene signature (PLOD2, DSG2, SPP1, CXCL8, MCM5, HLTF, and KLF4) ( 32 ) and a six-gene signature (APOC1, GLTP, ISG20, SPP1, SLC24A3 and UPP1) ( 24 ). These results reveals that our signature may lead to a better treatment decisions comparison with other published prognostic signatures…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Recent years the net reclassification index (NRI), integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) have become the two popularity alternatives assessment in risk evaluation or prediction between different models (21,22). We searched ten recently published CESC prognostic signatures, and used NRI, IDI method in "survIDINRI" package to compare the clinical benefits of our signature and published signatures (23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32).…”
Section: Clinical Benefits Evaluation Of Cesc Os Signaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previously, a nine-lncRNA signature was established to predict the 1 year PFS in patients with CC; this model had an AUC of 0.793, 0.780, and 0.742 in two GEO test sets and one TCGA test set, respectively ( Mao et al, 2019 ). A seven-gene prognostic signature for CC had also been developed using GEO data, predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS with AUC of 0.74, 0.76, and 0.81, respectively ( An et al, 2022 ). Another study established 11 immune-related gene signatures to assess OS in patients with CC, yielding 3- and 5-year AUC of 0.733 and 0.747 ( Yang S. et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The entire PI3K/AKT signaling pathway regulates the cell physiology and pathology, including apoptosis, cell proliferation, invasion, and metastasis [ 62 , 63 , 64 ]. This pathway is abnormally activated in different tumors, including cervical cancer [ 65 , 66 ].…”
Section: Lncrnas-regulated Pathways In Cervical Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%