2008
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2007.914867
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of Jiles–Atherton Model Parameters Using Particle Swarm Optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…After a number of iterations the optimal solution, indicated by swarming candidates, is determined. PSO has been applied for estimation of JA model parameters by Marion et al [28] and Knypiński et al [29].…”
Section: Comparison Of Different Estimation Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After a number of iterations the optimal solution, indicated by swarming candidates, is determined. PSO has been applied for estimation of JA model parameters by Marion et al [28] and Knypiński et al [29].…”
Section: Comparison Of Different Estimation Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elles sont calculées à partir de la dernière période des cycles dynamiques obtenus lorsque le régime permanent est établi. Le modèle de loi statique considéré est celui de Jiles Atherton dont les paramètres sont identifiés par la méthode PSO [8]. Tant que l'hypothèse d'homogénéité, en première approximation indiquée par la valeur de δ, est vérifiée, le modèle homogénéisé permet de donner des résultats précis (jusqu'à la fréquence de 500Hz).…”
Section: Protocole De Testunclassified
“…The original iterative estimation procedure proposed by Jiles et al [4] sometimes gave nonconsistent sets of model parameters [5,6]. Therefore most of the research focused on alternative methods for estimation of model parameters, and was usually based on artificial intelligence approaches [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. At the same time several authors realized that in order to obtain a reliable representation of more complex magnetization cycles, including minor loops, reversal curves etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%