2018 IEEE 18th International Conference on Communication Technology (ICCT) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/icct.2018.8600065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of Jamming Factors in Electronic Information System Based on Deep Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the performance evaluation, the authors include multi-tone jammers. The method achieves 92% accuracy (which is similar to [290]), yet the authors remark that the method attains a higher learning speed. As major drawbacks, this study lacks comparison with a benchmark model and assumes an ideal jamming pattern, i.e., the jammer can instantaneously shift frequencies.…”
Section: B Anti-jamming Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the performance evaluation, the authors include multi-tone jammers. The method achieves 92% accuracy (which is similar to [290]), yet the authors remark that the method attains a higher learning speed. As major drawbacks, this study lacks comparison with a benchmark model and assumes an ideal jamming pattern, i.e., the jammer can instantaneously shift frequencies.…”
Section: B Anti-jamming Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Applying DL in this process can significantly overcome the inaccuracies of mathematical models. In [290], the authors proposed a CNN-based jammer identification method which imitates the image processing applications of DL. This method first converts one-dimensional data into image format in order to train the network.…”
Section: B Anti-jamming Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the performance evaluation, the authors include multi-tone jammers. The method achieves 92% accuracy (which is similar to [278]), yet the authors remark that the method attains a higher learning speed. As major drawbacks, this study lacks comparison with a benchmark model and assumes an ideal jamming pattern, i.e., the jammer can instantaneously shift frequencies.…”
Section: B Anti-jamming Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Similarly, a fine tuning LeNet, with 1D sequences (size of 1*896) as inputs, also employed for 7 kinds of jammings identification in [569], which achieved an accuracy rate of 98%. In [570], a DL architecture was proposed to identify the jamming factors of electronic information system. The recognition method of four active jamming signal, based on CNN and STFT images as inputs, was proposed in [571], which achieved an accuracy rate of 99.86%, including blanket jamming, multiple false target jamming, narrow pulse jamming, and pure signal.…”
Section: A Jamming or Interference Classification And Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%