2000
DOI: 10.1016/s1386-1425(99)00252-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of irradiation treatment of aromatic herbs, spices and fruits by electron paramagnetic resonance and thermoluminescence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
62
2
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
6
62
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the cellulosic EPR signal disappeared within 70 days to 90 days after the irradiation process (Raffi et al 2000). Consequently, the method was deemed to fail in the verification of the gamma-radiation treatment and, consequently, it was recommended that thermoluminescence techniques should be used (Yordanov et al 1998;Raffi et al 2000;Delincée & Soika 2002;Bayram & Delincée 2004). Recently, Yordanov et al (2000) pointed to the different thermal behaviour of EPR signals of non-irradiated and gamma-radiation treated foods containing cellulose, even after a long storage period after radiation, when the specific "cellulosic" EPR signal is extremely low, and recommended this technique as a method to identify gamma-radiation processed foods.…”
Section: Detection and Potential Detection Methods For Spices Irradiamentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In general, the cellulosic EPR signal disappeared within 70 days to 90 days after the irradiation process (Raffi et al 2000). Consequently, the method was deemed to fail in the verification of the gamma-radiation treatment and, consequently, it was recommended that thermoluminescence techniques should be used (Yordanov et al 1998;Raffi et al 2000;Delincée & Soika 2002;Bayram & Delincée 2004). Recently, Yordanov et al (2000) pointed to the different thermal behaviour of EPR signals of non-irradiated and gamma-radiation treated foods containing cellulose, even after a long storage period after radiation, when the specific "cellulosic" EPR signal is extremely low, and recommended this technique as a method to identify gamma-radiation processed foods.…”
Section: Detection and Potential Detection Methods For Spices Irradiamentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, it was observed that the EPR intensity of the "cellulosic" triplet signal gradually decreased with the storage time, and that the rate of disappearance was dependent on temperature, humidity, the presence of oxygen, and other factors (Yordanov et al 1998(Yordanov et al , 2004Bayram & Delincée 2004;Polovka et al , 2007Suhaj et al 2006). In general, the cellulosic EPR signal disappeared within 70 days to 90 days after the irradiation process (Raffi et al 2000). Consequently, the method was deemed to fail in the verification of the gamma-radiation treatment and, consequently, it was recommended that thermoluminescence techniques should be used (Yordanov et al 1998;Raffi et al 2000;Delincée & Soika 2002;Bayram & Delincée 2004).…”
Section: Detection and Potential Detection Methods For Spices Irradiamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…고춧가루, 후추, thyme 등은 방사선 조사 처리 시 cellulose radical이 확인되어, 조사여부 확인시험법으로 ESR 방법이 적합하다고 보고되었으나 (5,6), 건조 양파, 건조 마늘, cumin, saffron, fennel, sage, savory 등은 조사처리에 따른 특이한 signal이 발견되지 않아 ESR 방법이 부적합하다고 보고된바 있다 (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14). 특히, Ahn •: Mn ion, *: cellulose radical.…”
Section: 쉽게 사라지는 단점이 있다(4)unclassified